Skip to main content

Security report for fotofiniss.lv

HOPSAA SIA · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fotofinišs, operated by HOPSAA SIA, is a Latvian small business specializing in sports event timing, results processing, and photo finish services, primarily serving cycling, running, and other sports communities. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact details and a focus on event results and scheduling. Technically, the site uses October CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various plugins, and it is served over HTTPS with Google Analytics integrated for user tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and privacy policies are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the business information on the site appears consistent and credible. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fotofiniss.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets sports event organizers and participants in Latvia, offering a niche service in event timing and results publication. Their business model is service-oriented, providing end-to-end event timing solutions including registration, number preparation, and result publication, along with photo finish and sound system services. The market position is that of a specialized local provider with a clear focus on cycling and running events. The presence of VAT and registration numbers indicates formal business operations. The website content and event listings suggest active engagement with the sports community. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are disclosed.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms for data submission, which is positive. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, indicating limited transparency in security practices. Google Analytics is used, but no cookie consent or privacy policy is provided, which may raise GDPR compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better policy disclosures and security header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and contact channel for security issues.
  4. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and plugins to their latest secure versions.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
HOPSAA SIA
VAT number
LV40103192076
Registration number
40103192076
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HOPSAA SIA
Description
Nodarbojamies ar sporta pasākumu laika uzskaiti, rezultātu apstrādi un publicēšanu. Nodrošinām pilnu sacensību tiesāšanas ciklu - sākot ar pieteikumu reģistrāciju, numuru sagatavošanu, beidzot ar rezultātu publicēšanu. Nodrošinām arī fotofiniša pakalpojumu, kas ir īpaši noderīgi šosejas riteņbraukšanas grupas braucienos un BMX sacensībās. Piedāvājam arī nelielu pasākumu apskaņošanu.
Key services
Sports event timing, Results processing and publication, Photo finish services, Event sound system services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.0.0, Bootstrap CSS, PrettyPhoto plugin, MediaElement player, FlexSlider, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer
  5. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking
  7. Website content is focused on sports event timing and results in Latvia
  8. No social media links found
  9. No security or incident response policies published
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on October CMS, leveraging jQuery 2.0.0, Bootstrap, PrettyPhoto, MediaElement, and FlexSlider plugins. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern front-end technologies. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization indicators found. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks explicitly identified. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. The technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fotofiniss.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fotofiniss.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.