Skip to main content

Security report for fortisls.lv

SIA Fortis Logistic Solutions · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Fortis Logistic Solutions is a Latvian logistics company specializing in land, sea, and air freight forwarding services since 2012. The company offers a range of services including cargo insurance, customs formalities, and warehouse services, targeting businesses requiring international shipment solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern performance optimizations and uses popular libraries such as jQuery and Fancyapps UI. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in implementing security headers and publishing security policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and business information appear legitimate and consistent with a small logistics provider. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with good privacy compliance and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fortisls.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fortis Logistic Solutions operates in the transportation sector with a focus on freight forwarding services. Their market positioning is that of an established regional player with over 10 years of experience and a high percentage of long-term clients (96%). The business model is service-oriented, providing logistics solutions to companies needing international cargo transport. Revenue streams likely come from freight services, insurance, and customs handling. The company targets business clients requiring reliable logistics support. The website indicates a partnership with GRANDEM for development, but no subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. Growth indicators include a professional website, multilingual support, and active social media presence on Facebook. Strategic observations suggest the company could enhance trust by publishing more detailed security and incident response information.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners compliant with GDPR, indicating a mature privacy approach. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security.txt or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency in vulnerability disclosure and incident handling. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Fancyapps UI is standard but requires regular auditing to avoid vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional security headers and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and incident response policy to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  4. Enhance contact information by providing direct company emails and phone numbers for support and security contacts.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect any changes in data processing and compliance requirements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Fortis Logistic Solutions
Description
SIA FORTIS LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS (FLS) is a logistics company founded in 2012 offering air, sea, and land freight forwarding services, cargo insurance, customs formalities, and warehouse services. They serve international shipments worldwide with over 10 years of experience.
Key services
Sauszemes pārvadājumi, Avio transports, Jūras transports, Kravu apdrošināšana, Negabarīta kravas, Noliktavu pakalpojumi, Muitas formalitātes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, WP Rocket, Fancyapps UI, Leaflet.js, Grand Cookie plugin, Sitepress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Lazy loading of images and scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Grand Cookie plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to logistics services.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML; contact via forms only.
  5. Uses modern WordPress CMS with performance optimizations.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable; limits domain trust verification.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook only.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.7.1, WP Rocket for performance optimization, and Fancyapps UI for UI components. It uses the Sitepress Multilingual CMS plugin for language support (Latvian, English, Russian). The site is well-optimized for performance with lazy loading of images and scripts, preloading, and caching mechanisms. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and accessible navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and hreflang attributes. No hosting provider information was detected. Technical risks include the lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for security hardening and enhanced transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fortisls.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fortisls.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.