Skip to main content

Security report for fornal.cz

FORNAL trading s.r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FORNAL trading s.r.o. is a Czech Republic based manufacturer specializing in vehicle superstructures and modifications, established in 2002. The company positions itself as a leading manufacturer in the transportation sector, targeting businesses requiring specialized vehicle modifications. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and shows minor backend PHP errors. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of a clear privacy policy and terms of service, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the website is functional and business-focused but would benefit from improved security practices and clearer compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fornal.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation manufacturing sector with a focus on vehicle superstructures. Its business model revolves around manufacturing and trading specialized vehicle components. The domain age of over 20 years supports a stable market presence. The website lacks explicit trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials, and contact information is not prominently displayed, which may impact customer confidence. The use of WordPress and Divi theme suggests reliance on popular CMS platforms, with potential for scalability. Marketing tools are minimal, limited to a popup builder plugin, indicating a basic digital marketing approach.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection against common web attacks. A visible PHP notice indicates some backend code issues that could potentially expose information or cause instability. No incident response or security policy information is found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of contact channels for security incidents reduces readiness for handling security events. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Fix backend PHP errors and ensure all WordPress plugins and themes are up to date to reduce vulnerabilities.
  3. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance web security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FORNAL trading s.r.o.
Description
Manufacturer specializing in vehicle superstructures and related products.
Key services
Vehicle superstructure manufacturing, Vehicle modifications
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Divi Theme, PHP
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Popup Builder plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Divi theme and Popup Builder plugin.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional.
  4. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers is not clearly presented on the homepage HTML.
  5. Minor PHP notice error visible indicating some backend code issues.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. SSL is enabled and functioning.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond popup plugin scripts.
  9. Website content is business-oriented and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Divi theme and uses jQuery for frontend scripting. Hosting appears to be provided by Active24, a Czech hosting provider. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and includes a popup builder plugin for marketing purposes. Performance is moderate with some inline CSS and JavaScript. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal, and SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site would benefit from modernization efforts including improved accessibility, SEO enhancements, and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fornal.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fornal.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.