Skip to main content

Security report for foreo.com

FOREO · Retail · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FOREO is a Swedish beauty and wellness company specializing in innovative skincare and oral care devices. The company positions itself as a leader in beauty-tech solutions, targeting consumers seeking professional-level personal care products. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in content, showcasing a broad product range and strong brand presence supported by celebrity endorsements and numerous awards. Technically, the site uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern security practices including HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data for the domain is unusual for a brand of this size and should be monitored for legitimacy concerns. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but explicit security policy and incident response contacts are not found. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture and business credibility with room for improvement in transparency around security policies and domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foreo.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention foreo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,724
Employees
12
Customers
3,677
Third parties
35
Weak passwords
14%

Latest record dated 2026-05-13 · 12 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for foreo.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –admin.foreo.com2026-05-13
  • –ct.foreo.com2026-05-13
  • –foreo.com2026-03-04
  • –foreo.com2025-08-20
  • –admin.foreo.com2025-08-01

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FOREO operates in the retail sector with a focus on e-commerce sales of beauty and wellness devices. The company leverages technology and innovation to differentiate itself in the competitive skincare and oral care markets. Its extensive awards and celebrity endorsements enhance brand trust and market positioning. The business model centers on direct-to-consumer sales via a professional and content-rich website. The target audience includes tech-savvy consumers interested in advanced personal care solutions. The company maintains a consistent brand image and invests in digital marketing and social media engagement. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor risk factor but does not currently detract from the overall strong market presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs security headers and Google reCAPTCHA to protect user interactions. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of Drupal CMS suggests built-in security features such as CSRF protection and secure form handling. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file was found. The overall security posture is good, but the company should consider publishing explicit security and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data protection.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Investigate and clarify the domain WHOIS data availability to improve transparency.
  5. Continue to maintain and update security headers and CMS to mitigate emerging threats.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FOREO
Description
FOREO is a Swedish beauty and wellness brand that specializes in producing skincare and oral care devices. FOREO is known for its innovative and technology-driven approach to personal care products.
Key services
Skincare devices, Oral care devices, Beauty-tech solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Commerce 2, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Identity Services, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens (inferred from Drupal)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong brand presence with celebrity endorsements and awards
  3. Comprehensive product catalog focused on beauty-tech devices
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is uncommon for a large brand domain
  7. Use of modern CMS (Drupal 10) and security best practices observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS with Commerce 2 for e-commerce functionality. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for identity and bot protection. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience. No critical technical debt or outdated components were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foreo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foreo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.