Skip to main content

Security report for ford.si

ford.si · Transportation · Slovenia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ford.si is the official website for Ford vehicles in Slovenia, representing a well-established automotive brand with a domain age dating back to 2004. The site offers comprehensive information on Ford's vehicle lineup, including electric and hybrid models, servicing options, financing, and test drives, targeting Slovenian consumers and businesses. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure utilizing modern web technologies such as Ruby on Rails, Stimulus JS, Turbo, and Mapbox GL JS, complemented by marketing and analytics tools from HubSpot and Google Tag Manager. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and consent management, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, providing a positive user experience and clear brand consistency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ford.si

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ford.si, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ford.si right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Ford as a key player in the Slovenian automotive market, offering a full range of vehicles and services. The business model focuses on direct vehicle sales, after-sales servicing, and financial products. The presence of a vehicle configurator and test drive booking indicates a customer-centric approach. The company is a subsidiary of the global Ford Motor Company, with a strong brand presence and digital marketing integration. The site’s social media links and structured data enhance brand visibility and customer engagement. No suspicious or fraudulent patterns were detected, supporting the legitimacy and credibility of the business.

Security posture

Ford.si exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented. The site uses CSRF tokens for form security and manages cookie consent effectively. However, there is no publicly available security policy or vulnerability disclosure program, which could enhance transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The use of third-party marketing and analytics scripts is standard but should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Incident response contact information is absent, which is a potential gap in security readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact details to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ford.si
Description
Uradna stran vozil Ford v Sloveniji.
Key services
Vehicle sales, Servicing and maintenance, Financial services, Test drives, Vehicle configurator
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Mapbox GL JS, noUiSlider, HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Turbo Rails, Stimulus JS, Trix Editor
Frameworks
Ruby on Rails (Turbo, Stimulus)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in forms
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Ford Slovenia website with comprehensive vehicle listings and services
  2. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  3. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with consent management
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  5. Strong branding and consistent user experience
  6. Presence of multiple social media channels linked
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack with Ruby on Rails frameworks (Turbo, Stimulus), and uses advanced JavaScript libraries such as Mapbox GL JS and noUiSlider for interactive features. HubSpot and Google Tag Manager are integrated for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed. The technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience, though some accessibility improvements could be made.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ford.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ford.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.