Skip to main content

Security report for footshop.dk

Footshop a.s. · Retail · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Footshop a.s. operates a professional e-commerce platform specializing in sneakers, clothing, and accessories, targeting sneaker enthusiasts and fashion consumers primarily in Denmark and Europe. The company positions itself as a leading sneaker retailer with a broad product range from popular brands and offers services such as free returns and a loyalty program. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure using modern technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Typekit fonts, built likely on the PrestaShop CMS platform. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although explicit security headers and incident response information are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data is typical for .dk domains and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the website reflects a trustworthy and professional retail business with good privacy compliance and moderate user tracking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching footshop.dk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
35
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Footshop a.s. holds a strong market position in the retail sneaker segment in Denmark and Europe, leveraging a broad brand portfolio and a comprehensive product catalog. The business model focuses on direct-to-consumer online sales complemented by physical stores in multiple European cities. The company benefits from a loyalty program and active social media presence across major platforms, enhancing customer engagement and brand visibility. The website's structured navigation and detailed product categorization support effective customer journeys. While financial and founding data are not disclosed, the company's digital maturity and market footprint suggest a medium-sized enterprise with growth potential. Partnerships with major brands and use of established marketing and analytics tools indicate a well-integrated ecosystem supporting business operations.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, representing areas for improvement. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot is managed without exposing sensitive data. Security headers are partially inferred but not explicitly confirmed, and no vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response plan may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose a comprehensive security policy including incident response procedures.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Footshop a.s.
Description
Det største udvalg af sneakers fra adidas, Converse, Nike, Vans og mange flere med lagertilgængelighed og gratis returnering! Shop til gode priser på Footshop.dk.
Key services
Online sneaker sales, Clothing and accessories sales, Free returns, Footshop Club loyalty program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Typekit Fonts, Webpack, React (implied by hypernova keys and JSON data), Service Workers
Frameworks
PrestaShop (implied by URL structure and scripts)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Strong privacy and cookie consent implementation
  3. No visible security policy or incident response info
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, typical for .dk domains
  5. Modern tech stack with good SEO and mobile optimization
  6. Clear business presence with contact info and social media links
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring PrestaShop CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Adobe Typekit fonts. It uses Webpack for asset bundling and includes service worker scripts for progressive web app capabilities. The site is optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with structured data in JSON-LD format for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for external resources. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports a robust and scalable e-commerce platform with opportunities to improve accessibility and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with footshop.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review footshop.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.