Skip to main content

Security report for foodsystemchange.org

NAHhaft e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website foodsystemchange.org is registered to NAHhaft e.V., a German non-profit organization founded in 2020. The domain and registrant information are consistent and legitimate, indicating a small non-profit entity likely focused on food system change initiatives. However, the website content is currently inaccessible, returning a TYPO3 404 error page with no active site configuration. This prevents any meaningful analysis of business services, audience, or content. The technical infrastructure shows use of TYPO3 CMS hosted by Cronon GmbH in Germany, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, indicating a basic security posture. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or forms are available on the page. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, and no adult or questionable content is present. Overall, the site is non-functional and lacks essential compliance and security features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foodsystemchange.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention foodsystemchange.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for foodsystemchange.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the inaccessible website content, detailed business intelligence is limited. The registrant NAHhaft e.V. is a German non-profit, suggesting a mission-driven organization likely operating in the non-profit sector focused on food systems. The domain age and registration details align with a small organization. No information on market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available from the site. The lack of active content and contact details limits visibility into business operations or growth indicators.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, and no security headers are detected in the HTML content. There is no evidence of HTTPS configuration from the provided data, though it is likely enabled given modern hosting standards. No incident response or security policies are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. The site is vulnerable to basic security risks due to missing headers and lack of DNS security. No WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and configure DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify it is active.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  5. Configure the TYPO3 CMS properly to publish active website content and contact information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NAHhaft e.V.
Description
No business description available due to inaccessible content.
Content quality
poor

Technology

Frameworks
TYPO3
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible, showing a TYPO3 404 error page.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present on the page.
  4. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  5. No external marketing or advertising services detected.
  6. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and legitimate.
  7. Site uses TYPO3 CMS but is not properly configured or published.
  8. No security headers or DNSSEC enabled, indicating basic security posture.
  9. No HTTPS information provided; assume HTTPS is enabled due to modern standards but unconfirmed.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS hosted by Cronon GmbH in Germany. The HTML content is minimal and returns a 404 error page indicating no site configuration. No external scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies are detected. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for modern web security. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and contact forms indicates incomplete technical and compliance implementation. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to lack of content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foodsystemchange.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foodsystemchange.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.