Skip to main content

Security report for foodspot.lv

FoodSpot · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FoodSpot is a Latvian company specializing in smart retail solutions, including smart fridges, vending machines, and micro markets that enable contactless shopping experiences. Their business model targets both businesses looking to deploy automated retail solutions and partners interested in selling products through these platforms. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and a focus on user convenience. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and Google Tag Manager for security and analytics. Payment processing is securely outsourced to Stripe, ensuring no sensitive card data is handled directly by FoodSpot. Security posture is generally good but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foodspot.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention foodspot.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for foodspot.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FoodSpot occupies a niche in the automated retail market in Latvia, offering innovative solutions that combine technology and retail convenience. Their competitive advantage lies in providing unmanned stores that operate 24/7 with contactless payment options, appealing to modern consumers and businesses seeking efficiency. The company leverages partnerships with payment processors like Stripe and targets sectors such as education, workplaces, healthcare, and residential areas. The business model includes direct deployment of smart fridges and vending machines as well as a partner program for product sellers. Growth potential is indicated by the diverse industry applications and the ease of setup emphasized on the site. However, lack of detailed corporate information and absence of privacy and security policies may impact trust with larger enterprise clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect form submissions. Payment processing is delegated to Stripe, reducing PCI DSS scope and enhancing security. However, the site lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder transparency and trust. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates gaps in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, there is room for improvement to reach a higher security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve accessibility features to ensure compliance with standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Obtain and display relevant certifications or trust badges to strengthen business credibility and customer confidence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FoodSpot
Description
FoodSpot offers smart sales solutions focusing on unmanned stores such as smart fridges, vending machines, and micro markets. Their solutions enable contactless shopping with mobile phones and automated 24/7 sales.
Key services
Smart Fridge, Micro Market, Vending Machines, Web Application for contactless shopping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Open Sans), Google reCAPTCHA v2 (invisible), Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), Validate.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by origin-trial meta tag and Google services)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form submission
  • Payment processing delegated to Stripe (no card data stored)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, address, and contact form with reCAPTCHA.
  5. Payment processing is outsourced to Stripe, enhancing payment security.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies and is mobile optimized.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information present.
  9. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack using Bootstrap 5 and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and compatibility across devices. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and marketing tracking. The use of Google reCAPTCHA protects forms from spam and abuse. The site loads external resources asynchronously where possible, aiding performance. However, no CMS or backend technology is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The absence of explicit security headers and privacy policies indicates some technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foodspot.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foodspot.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.