Skip to main content

Security report for foodmark.se

Foodmark AB · Retail · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Foodmark AB is a well-established Swedish food manufacturing and marketing company with a portfolio of several popular national brands in categories such as salads, sauces, dressings, messmör, and soft cheese. Founded in 1937, the company holds a strong market position in Sweden's retail and foodservice sectors. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress with performance optimizations and a focus on brand storytelling and sustainability. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the site is accessible, well-structured, and trustworthy, supporting Foodmark's business credibility and customer engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foodmark.se

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
98
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Foodmark operates a manufacturing and marketing business model focused on branded food products distributed widely in Sweden. The company leverages a portfolio of subsidiary brands, each with its own heritage and market niche, enhancing competitive advantage. The website targets Swedish consumers and business clients, providing detailed brand information and sustainability commitments. The use of a dedicated career platform indicates active talent acquisition. The company is part of the Agra Gruppen AS group, indicating a larger corporate structure. The digital ecosystem includes partner domains for each brand, supporting brand-specific marketing and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, reflecting compliance with basic privacy regulations. However, no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, and security headers are not detected, which could expose the site to certain risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Foodmark AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Foodmark AB
Description
Foodmark AB producerar och marknadsför flera av Sveriges mest kända och älskade livsmedel inom kategorierna sallader, såser, dressingar, samt messmör och mjukost. Med hjälp av våra varumärken är vår ambition att inspirera till enkla och goda matupplevelser.
Key services
Production of food products, Marketing of food brands
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WP Rocket, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is primarily in Swedish with clear business focus
  3. Multiple well-known Swedish food brands are presented as subsidiaries
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers visible on homepage or footer
  7. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn
  8. Technical implementation uses WordPress with performance optimizations (WP Rocket)
  9. Security headers are not explicitly detected in HTML content
  10. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WP Rocket for performance optimization and uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are employed for tracking and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and preloading strategies. While performance is moderate, the site could benefit from further optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but should address security header gaps and improve SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foodmark.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foodmark.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.