Skip to main content

Security report for foodlevel.eu

Retail · Lithuania

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Foodlevel is a Lithuanian-based company specializing in the supply and distribution of frozen, fresh, smoked, canned, culinary, and grocery food products primarily targeting the horeca and retail sectors within Lithuania. The company offers logistics and delivery services nationwide, positioning itself as a regional supplier with a focus on quality and customer service. The website content is professionally presented in Lithuanian with an English language option, indicating a focus on local and possibly international business clients. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Swiper, Fancybox, and other libraries to provide a responsive and interactive user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented in compliance with GDPR, and Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis. However, no explicit CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes Google ReCaptcha on forms to mitigate spam. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, but security headers are not explicitly detected, and no public security or incident response policies are found. The WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy restrictions, but the website's professional presentation and contact details support its legitimacy. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified. Overall, Foodlevel presents a credible and professional online presence suitable for its business model. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility could enhance its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foodlevel.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Foodlevel operates in the Lithuanian food distribution sector, focusing on frozen and chilled products for horeca and retail clients. Its business model centers on B2B supply with integrated logistics and delivery services, which is a competitive advantage in the regional market. The company maintains a clear digital presence with multilingual support and social media engagement via Facebook. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales and logistics services. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and customer contact channels. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business intelligence but does not detract from the apparent operational legitimacy. Partnerships with local service providers such as Texus (web development) indicate a professional approach to digital infrastructure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam measures like Google ReCaptcha implemented on forms. Cookie consent aligns with GDPR requirements, reflecting awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of publicly available security or incident response policies represent gaps that could be exploited or reduce trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The WHOIS privacy protection is justified but limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but would benefit from enhanced security controls and public documentation to improve resilience and stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update all third-party libraries and scripts to the latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding more trust indicators such as certifications, customer testimonials, or compliance badges to strengthen business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Foodlevel is a Lithuanian company specializing in the distribution and supply of frozen and chilled food products including fish, culinary products, groceries, and more. They offer logistics and delivery services across Lithuania and target horeca and retail sectors.
Key services
Frozen products, Fresh products, Canned products, Smoked products, Culinary products, Groceries, Logistics and delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Fancybox, Swiper, Select2, Modernizr, MediaElement.js, Plupload
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google ReCaptcha on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Lithuanian with English language option available.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms are implemented.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy restrictions.
  7. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and has good mobile optimization.
  8. No critical security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  10. No certifications or compliance badges displayed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper for sliders, Fancybox for modals, Select2 for enhanced select boxes, and Modernizr for feature detection. MediaElement.js is used for media playback, and Plupload handles file uploads. The site loads multiple CSS stylesheets and JavaScript files with cache-busting query parameters indicating active maintenance. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and Open Graph for social sharing. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation supports a functional and user-friendly website but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foodlevel.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foodlevel.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.