Skip to main content

Security report for fondsvaivari.lv

Centra "Vaivari" attīstības fonds · Non-profit · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Centra "Vaivari" attīstības fonds is a Latvian non-profit organization dedicated to supporting rehabilitation and social projects primarily for people with disabilities. The foundation collaborates with national rehabilitation centers and other organizations to organize events, develop infrastructure, and provide community support. The website is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics. While the site is functional and provides relevant content, it lacks key privacy and security policies, and no WHOIS data was available to verify domain registration details. The security posture is moderate with room for improvement in headers and compliance. Overall, the site serves its niche audience well but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fondsvaivari.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector focusing on rehabilitation and disability support in Latvia. It maintains a clear niche with a small organizational size and a focused target audience. The business model revolves around fundraising, event organization, and community engagement. The website content reflects ongoing projects and collaborations, indicating active operations. The presence of a Facebook page supports outreach efforts. However, the lack of detailed contact information and privacy policies may limit trust and donor confidence. The foundation appears to be well-positioned within its local market but could improve digital maturity and compliance to enhance credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics for tracking. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible privacy or cookie policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency, header implementation, and compliance documentation to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centra "Vaivari" attīstības fonds
Description
Centra "Vaivari" attīstības fonds is a non-profit organization supporting the National Rehabilitation Center "Vaivari" in Latvia. It organizes and supports rehabilitation, social, and medical projects, including sports activities for people with disabilities and infrastructure development for persons with mobility impairments.
Key services
Organizing rehabilitation and sports events, Supporting infrastructure projects for disabled persons, Fundraising and community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Photo Gallery plugin, Google Fonts (Open Sans), FontAwesome, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit foundation site.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with some English metadata.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or visible content.
  5. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. Site navigation and content structure are clear and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with jQuery and a photo gallery plugin. It uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as fonts.googleapis.com and google-analytics.com. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and security headers. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small non-profit website but could benefit from enhanced security and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fondsvaivari.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fondsvaivari.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.