Skip to main content

Security report for fondpudy.cz

Český fond půdy · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Český fond půdy is a Czech investment fund specializing in agricultural land acquisition and management, targeting long-term sustainable growth and soil fertility preservation. The fund pools private and institutional investors to consolidate fragmented land parcels into larger, better-managed holdings, generating rental income and capital appreciation. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses standard tracking tools like Google Analytics. Contact information is clearly provided, but privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but outdated JavaScript libraries and missing security headers. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site presents a professional investment opportunity with room for technical and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fondpudy.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The fund operates in the niche market of agricultural land investment in the Czech Republic, managing assets worth approximately 2.4 billion CZK. It targets conservative, long-term investors and emphasizes sustainability and local agricultural development. The business model leverages land consolidation and professional management to enhance value. The fund is regulated by the Maltese Financial Services Authority and partners with Conseq Investment Management for oversight and payment processing. The website content is rich and informative, supporting investor confidence. Growth indicators include an expanding investor base and ongoing land acquisitions. Strategic observations highlight the fund's role in addressing fragmented land ownership and supporting local agriculture.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure form submission methods. However, it relies on an outdated jQuery version (1.8.2) with known vulnerabilities and lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No published security or incident response policies were found, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. These gaps expose the site to potential risks including cross-site scripting and brute force attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan with dedicated contact channels.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Český fond SICAV Plc
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Český fond půdy
Description
Český fond půdy is an investment club focused on sustainable agricultural land ownership and management in the Czech Republic. It pools private investors to acquire and manage agricultural land, aiming for long-term, sustainable growth and protection of soil fertility.
Key services
Agricultural land acquisition, Land consolidation and management, Leasing land to farmers, Sustainable land stewardship projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Elementor 3.11.5, Font: Open Sans, WordPress 5.9.12
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async scripts
  • Login form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the investment fund.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  4. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. Website uses WordPress with Elementor builder.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  9. No evidence of adult or unsafe content.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.12 with the Elementor 3.11.5 page builder, using Open Sans font and jQuery 1.8.2. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site loads scripts asynchronously, improving performance, but the use of an outdated jQuery version poses security risks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO features and security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fondpudy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fondpudy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.