Skip to main content

Security report for fondonegri.it

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website is a login portal for Plesk Obsidian 18.0.72, a commercial web hosting control panel software widely used by hosting providers and administrators. The page is designed primarily for authenticated users to access hosting management features. The business behind the software is positioned as a technology provider in the web hosting industry, targeting hosting service providers and web administrators. The site content is minimal, focusing on login functionality with cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks visible privacy policies or contact information on this page. Technically, the site uses the Plesk UI library, JavaScript frameworks like Prototype.js and RequireJS, and standard web technologies. The page is moderately optimized for mobile and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO features. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS (implied by URL), includes CSRF protection tokens, and password input controls, but no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. DNSSEC is not enabled for the domain, which is a recommended improvement. The domain is well-established, created in 2000, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and explicit privacy/security policies. The site is safe with no adult or questionable content. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. The lack of visible business contact details and privacy policy on this page limits privacy compliance scoring. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and providing clear privacy and security policies linked from the login page.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fondonegri.it

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Plesk is a recognized player in the web hosting control panel market, offering software solutions for hosting providers and web administrators. The business model revolves around licensing and supporting hosting management software. The target customers are hosting companies and IT professionals managing web infrastructure. The company benefits from a long domain history and established brand presence. The ecosystem includes official documentation and support portals. No direct business contact or corporate information is visible on this login page, which is typical for software login portals. The market position is strong within its niche, with competitive advantages in usability and integration with hosting environments.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens and password input best practices. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the security posture. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security. No incident response or security policy information is provided on this page. The cookie consent mechanism is GDPR-aware but lacks a linked privacy policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but should enhance header security and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add visible and comprehensive privacy and security policies linked from the login page.
  4. Provide clear contact information or support channels for security incidents and general inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This is a login page for Plesk Obsidian web hosting control panel software, specifically the web host edition.
Key services
Web hosting management, Domain management, Subscription management, Security and cookie consent management
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Plesk Obsidian 18.0.72, Prototype.js, RequireJS, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Plesk UI Library
Platforms
Plesk Web Hosting Control Panel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of hidden CSRF token in meta tag
  • Password input field with show/hide toggle

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry (error tracking)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Sentry
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Plesk Obsidian login page for web hosting control panel
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service links found on login page
  3. Cookie consent banner and mechanism present and GDPR-aware
  4. No contact information or business details visible on login page
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content
  6. Domain is old and appears legitimate
  7. No WAF or blocking detected
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Plesk Obsidian 18.0.72 platform using standard web technologies including Prototype.js and RequireJS for JavaScript management. The UI is based on the Plesk UI library with CSS and HTML5. The page is moderately optimized for mobile devices and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO meta tags or structured data for business information. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content. The site uses a cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance features. No CMS is detected as this is a specialized control panel interface. The technical stack is appropriate for the intended use case but could benefit from enhanced security headers and metadata for improved SEO and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fondonegri.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fondonegri.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.