Skip to main content

Security report for fondazionecrj.it

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Jesi · Non-profit · Italy

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Jesi is a regional non-profit foundation based in Italy, focused on promoting cultural, educational, and social initiatives within the Vallesina and Valle del Misa areas. The foundation offers services including exhibitions, conferences, grants, and access to archival and library resources. Their website is built on WordPress using the GeneratePress theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Iubenda for cookie compliance. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with SEO optimization, mobile responsiveness, and basic accessibility features. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, although no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a visible cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy page. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy online presence for a small-sized non-profit organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 5 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fondazionecrj.it

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fondazionecrj.it, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fondazionecrj.it right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector, targeting local communities interested in cultural and educational development. It maintains a clear organizational structure with published statutes and regulations, enhancing transparency. The business model relies on grants, cultural events, and community engagement. The presence of social media channels on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn supports outreach and stakeholder engagement. The foundation's market position is stable within its regional niche, with no indications of commercial activities. The website content and structure support its mission effectively, although direct contact details like emails and phone numbers are not prominently displayed, relying instead on contact forms.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with an excellent SSL configuration and includes essential security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. The use of Google Tag Manager is controlled, and cookie consent is implemented via Iubenda, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid for a non-profit website but could benefit from additional documentation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Jesi
Description
Mostre, convegni e contributi sul territorio della Vallesina e Valle del Misa
Key services
cultural exhibitions, conferences, grants and funding for local projects, library and archive services, event hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
GeneratePress theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-maintained non-profit foundation site
  2. Content is primarily in Italian and focused on cultural and social projects
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices
  4. Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the main HTML; contact is via form
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the GeneratePress theme, ensuring a modern and maintainable infrastructure. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and icons from FontAwesome. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. The site includes cookie consent management through Iubenda, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous monitoring of plugin and script updates is recommended to avoid technical debt and security issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fondazionecrj.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fondazionecrj.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.