Skip to main content

Security report for fondationloreal.com

Fondation L’Oréal · Non-profit · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fondation L’Oréal is a reputable non-profit organization dedicated to empowering women, particularly in the fields of science and inclusive beauty. It operates internationally with strong partnerships, notably with UNESCO and its parent company L’Oréal. The foundation offers programs supporting women scientists, vocational beauty training, and social integration initiatives. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on Drupal 10, integrating modern analytics and consent management tools. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trust but is common for such organizations. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy with a high level of user experience and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fondationloreal.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
85
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong market position as a socially responsible entity focusing on women empowerment through science and beauty. Its business model is non-profit, funded and supported by L’Oréal, with programs that have international reach. The target audience includes women scientists, vulnerable women seeking social integration, and the broader community interested in inclusive beauty. The foundation leverages partnerships and digital platforms to extend its impact. The website content and structure support clear communication of its mission and programs, enhancing credibility and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliance, and use of trusted third-party analytics and consent management services. However, there is no explicit public security policy or incident response information, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of modern frameworks and libraries reduces risk, but continuous monitoring and explicit security disclosures would strengthen trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Verify and explicitly implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Consider providing clear company contact emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fondation L’Oréal
Description
The Fondation L’Oréal supports and empowers women to shape their future and make a difference in society, focusing on scientific research and inclusive beauty.
Key services
Women in Science programs, Beauty for a Better Life initiatives, Emergency assistance, Knowledge and resources dissemination
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, SimpleBar, Swiper
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern libraries and frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich
  2. Strong focus on women empowerment and science
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible
  5. No security or incident response contact information found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly privacy protected or domain unregistered
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and secure CMS platform, and uses several contemporary JavaScript libraries such as Bowser for browser detection, SimpleBar for custom scrollbars, and Swiper for sliders. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and analytics, alongside OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the presence of Cloudflare scripts suggests CDN and security services usage. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fondationloreal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fondationloreal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.