Skip to main content

Security report for fondation-nature-homme.org

Fondation pour la Nature et l’Homme · Non-profit · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fondation pour la Nature et l’Homme is a well-established French non-profit organization dedicated to environmental awareness and ecological solutions. The foundation operates multiple programs focused on biodiversity preservation, sustainable agriculture, responsible food consumption, and decarbonized mobility. It engages a broad audience including volunteers, donors, and citizens, leveraging digital platforms and partnerships to amplify its impact. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies and comprehensive content supporting its mission. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with advanced JavaScript frameworks like Alpine.js and HTMX, and integrates analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Matomo. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a smooth user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and consent management implemented, though some security headers could be explicitly added for enhanced protection. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust verification, but the website's branding, certifications, and external references strongly support its legitimacy. No blocking or WAF mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the foundation demonstrates a strong commitment to transparency, privacy compliance, and user engagement. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a formal security policy and incident response information, and maintaining vigilance on third-party scripts. These steps will further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fondation-nature-homme.org

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a significant position in the French environmental non-profit sector with over three decades of activity. Its business model relies on donations, partnerships, and volunteer mobilization. The organization targets environmentally conscious citizens and stakeholders interested in sustainable development. Its ecosystem includes several related domains and campaigns, enhancing outreach and impact. The foundation's clear communication of tax benefits for donors and active social media presence contribute to its competitive advantage and growth potential.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS and consent management in place. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, explicit security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly configured, representing an area for improvement. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could be added to improve security culture and incident handling readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly configure security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response page on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and enhance privacy compliance measures, including clear data retention policies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fondation pour la Nature et l’Homme
Description
La Fondation pour la Nature et l’Homme est une fondation française reconnue d’utilité publique dont l’objet est d’assurer une sensibilisation à l’environnement.
Key services
Environmental awareness and education, Biodiversity preservation programs, Promotion of sustainable agriculture and food, Support for local ecological farming, Promotion of decarbonized mobility, Donor engagement and fundraising
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery 3.6.3, Alpine.js, HTMX, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Matomo Analytics, Bing Ads, Consent Framework scripts
Frameworks
Alpine.js, HTMX
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management platform for cookies
  • No inline scripts with suspicious content

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Matomo
Marketing tools
Consent Framework
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Strong focus on environmental and ecological programs.
  3. Multiple donation options with clear tax deduction information.
  4. Active social media presence with verified accounts.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  7. No visible security or content blocking issues.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on WordPress CMS with JavaScript frameworks Alpine.js and HTMX for interactivity. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools including Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Matomo, alongside Bing Ads for advertising. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and rich media content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and engaging user experience with room for optimization in performance and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fondation-nature-homme.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fondation-nature-homme.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.