Skip to main content

Security report for fofrcz.cz

RSC Logistics, logistické družstvo · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FOFR is a Czech logistics and transportation company specializing in parcel and freight delivery services across the Czech Republic and internationally. The company offers a broad range of services including express delivery, oversized cargo transport, ADR transport for dangerous goods, warehousing, and logistics solutions. Their market position is that of a national provider with extensive coverage and a focus on reliability and speed. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content quality, targeting businesses and individuals needing transportation services. Technically, the website uses a custom CMS platform with a technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Matomo, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile responsive and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. However, some JavaScript libraries are outdated, and accessibility features are basic. The site employs cookie consent mechanisms and tracking scripts with opt-out capabilities. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses CAPTCHA on forms, but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and contact information support legitimacy. Overall, FOFR presents a solid business and digital presence with room for improvement in privacy policy transparency, security documentation, and WHOIS data availability. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fofrcz.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FOFR operates in the transportation sector as a medium-sized Czech logistics provider. Their competitive advantage lies in nationwide coverage, diverse service offerings including express and ADR transport, and integrated warehousing solutions. The business model focuses on B2B and B2C parcel delivery and freight forwarding. Revenue streams likely include transport fees, warehousing rentals, and value-added logistics services. The target customers are businesses requiring reliable parcel and freight transport and individuals needing parcel delivery. The company partners with ANTEE for website development and uses third-party analytics and marketing tools. Growth indicators include active news updates and service expansion. Strategic observations suggest focusing on digital security and compliance to enhance market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of CAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms indicate awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, security policy, incident response information, and security.txt file indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries could pose vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The security score reflects a need for improved documentation and enhanced HTTP security headers to align with best practices and regulatory requirements such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and disclose a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to latest secure versions.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RSC Logistics, logistické družstvo
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RSC Logistics, logistické družstvo
Description
FOFR is a Czech transportation company specializing in parcel and package delivery across the Czech Republic and internationally. They offer express delivery, oversized cargo transport, ADR (dangerous goods) transport, warehousing, and related logistics services.
Key services
Parcel and package delivery, Express delivery, Oversized cargo transport, ADR transport, Warehousing, Logistics and forwarding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.0.0, jQuery UI 1.8.20, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Cycle2 jQuery plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-943231569)
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. Multiple analytics and marketing scripts used with opt-out consent.
  5. No explicit privacy policy page found, but terms of service present.
  6. Contact information is comprehensive and includes emails, phone, and addresses.
  7. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries, though some are outdated versions.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No adult or NSFW content present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform with a technology stack including jQuery 3.0.0, jQuery UI, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Matomo, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. It uses Google Fonts and CDN-hosted CSS for styling. The site is mobile responsive with dynamic menu adjustments and search functionality. Performance is moderate with some legacy library versions. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA and label usage but could be improved. SEO is supported by meta tags, sitemap links, and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fofrcz.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fofrcz.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.