Skip to main content

Security report for fnj.cz

Římskokatolická farnost Nový Jičín · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Římskokatolická farnost Nový Jičín operates as a local Roman Catholic parish serving the Nový Jičín area and nearby communities. The website provides information about parish activities, spiritual services, community events, and religious education. It targets local parishioners and Christian community members, positioning itself as a trusted religious institution with a history dating back to 2008. The business model is non-profit, focusing on community and spiritual engagement rather than commercial activities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern but typical plugin and library stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics. The site is hosted likely by WEDOS, consistent with the registrar data. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though some technical improvements could enhance security and performance, such as consolidating JavaScript libraries and adding security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for GDPR compliance and overall security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were found. The WHOIS data supports legitimacy with consistent registration details and domain age appropriate for the business. Overall, the website is a well-maintained, trustworthy platform for its community purpose but could benefit from enhanced security practices and privacy compliance features to strengthen its posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fnj.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The parish holds a stable position as a local religious institution with a clear community focus. Its competitive advantage lies in its established presence and comprehensive local engagement through events, sacraments, and education. The business model is non-commercial, relying on community participation and donations. The target customers are local parishioners and religious community members. Growth indicators include active content updates and event announcements. The partnership ecosystem is limited to religious and local community networks. Strategic observations suggest focusing on digital engagement improvements and compliance with evolving privacy regulations.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leaks are evident. However, the absence of security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The use of multiple jQuery versions may introduce risks of conflicts or vulnerabilities. GDPR compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policy pages are not found, indicating limited formal security governance. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Consolidate JavaScript libraries to a single jQuery version to reduce potential conflicts and vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  4. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Římskokatolická farnost Nový Jičín
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Římskokatolická farnost Nový Jičín
Description
Římskokatolická farnost Nový Jičín is a Roman Catholic parish community in Nový Jičín, part of the Ostrava-Opava diocese and the Nový Jičín deanery. The parish serves local communities including Kunín and Šenov u Nového Jičína, offering spiritual services, community events, sacraments, and religious education.
Key services
Religious services and sacraments, Community events and gatherings, Religious education and preparation, Parish news and announcements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.2, Bootstrap 5, jQuery 3.5.1 and 3.6.0, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, Select2, Toastr, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Redux Framework, WP Tiles, Skaut Google Drive Gallery plugin, Events Calendar Pro
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established local parish site with clear religious and community focus.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well structured.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR privacy policy presence.
  5. Use of multiple JavaScript libraries and plugins typical for WordPress sites.
  6. No visible security headers in HTML source; potential area for improvement.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided but no email addresses found in HTML content.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature WordPress CMS with a variety of plugins for functionality including page building, event management, and galleries. The tech stack is modern but includes some redundancy (multiple jQuery versions). Performance is moderate with CDN usage for common libraries. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design frameworks. Technical debt is moderate due to plugin complexity and potential outdated components. Opportunities exist to streamline scripts, improve security headers, and enhance SEO and accessibility features to reduce risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fnj.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fnj.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.