Skip to main content

Security report for fmlogistic.in

FM Logistic India · Transportation · India

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FM Logistic India is a well-established logistics and supply chain services provider operating as part of the global FM Logistic Group. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including warehousing, co-packing, omnichannel logistics, transport, and supply chain optimization, targeting businesses in India and worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content tailored to business clients. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern performance and SEO optimizations, leveraging tools like Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Rollbar for monitoring. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved and incident response information is not publicly available. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR considerations. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with business claims. Overall, FM Logistic India presents a credible, professional, and secure online presence aligned with its business operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fmlogistic.in

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FM Logistic India holds a strong market position as one of the top contract logistics providers in India, supported by a global parent company. Their business model focuses on providing scalable and integrated logistics solutions across multiple sectors, emphasizing sustainability and innovation. The company targets large enterprises and businesses requiring complex supply chain services. The website highlights strategic initiatives like carbon emission calculation and supply chain performance white papers, indicating a focus on thought leadership and sustainability. Partnerships and marketing efforts are supported by Pardot and other marketing tools. The company maintains active social media channels to engage with stakeholders and enhance brand visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of monitoring tools like Rollbar. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate awareness of data protection regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure page are areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site uses security tokens in forms to prevent automated abuse. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional headers and transparency on incident handling.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response page or contact channel to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance security policy documentation by referencing recognized frameworks such as ISO 27001 or NIST to demonstrate commitment to best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FM Logistic India
Description
FM Logistic India provides logistics solutions and services worldwide, specializing in supply chain performance, warehousing, co-packing, omnichannel logistics, transport, and supply chain optimization.
Key services
Warehousing, Co-packing, Omnichannel logistics, Transport, Supply Chain Optimisation, Urban Logistics, Multi-Client Facilities, Control Tower
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Plyr.js, Rollbar, Google Tag Manager, TrustCommander, Contact Form 7, WP Rocket
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Rollbar for error monitoring
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security tokens added to forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Pardot, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrustCommander, GAConnector, Pardot
Marketing tools
Pardot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent messaging.
  3. Comprehensive navigation with detailed service and corporate information.
  4. Multiple social media channels actively linked.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  6. Good privacy and cookie compliance with user consent mechanisms.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. WHOIS data supports business legitimacy and transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Plyr.js for media, Rollbar for error tracking, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance optimizations are implemented via WP Rocket caching and lazy loading. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is well handled with Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for rich snippets. The use of multiple external domains for analytics and marketing is well managed. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site loads fast and reliably. Technical risks are minimal but depend on maintaining plugin and script updates.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fmlogistic.in. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fmlogistic.in.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.