Skip to main content

Security report for fluidtime.com

Fluidtime Data Services GmbH · Transportation · Austria

Partial score · DNS & email only

49/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fluidtime Data Services GmbH is a medium-sized Austrian company specializing in Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) solutions and sustainable mobility management tools. Positioned as a pioneer in the transportation technology sector, Fluidtime offers tailored software platforms that enable businesses and organizations to implement green mobility projects efficiently. Their website is professionally designed, content-rich, and targets organizations aiming to achieve sustainability goals through innovative mobility services. The company maintains a strong partnership network and active social media presence, enhancing its market credibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the Enfold theme and supports multilingual content via WPML. It employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates Matomo Analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking. SEO is enhanced through Yoast SEO plugin, and the site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features. However, performance metrics are not explicitly available. From a security perspective, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not serve content over HTTPS, representing a critical vulnerability. No modern TLS protocols or security headers like HSTS are enabled, which exposes users to potential risks. Cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-compliant privacy policies are well implemented, reflecting good privacy compliance. Contact information is clearly provided, but no explicit security or incident response policies are found. Overall, while Fluidtime demonstrates strong business credibility and technical maturity in content and privacy compliance, the absence of HTTPS significantly undermines its security posture. Addressing this critical issue should be a top priority to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fluidtime.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
49

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fluidtime operates in the transportation and technology sectors, focusing on MaaS and sustainable mobility solutions. Their business model revolves around providing software platforms and tools that facilitate green deal implementations and mobility management for enterprises and public organizations. The company leverages partnerships with numerous national and international entities, enhancing its competitive advantage and market reach. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, consulting, and platform services. The target customers are businesses and institutions aiming to improve mobility sustainability. The website content and partner ecosystem indicate a well-established presence with growth potential in the evolving MaaS market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No advanced security headers or TLS protocols are enabled, and session resumption features are absent. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and privacy policies. However, no explicit incident response or security policy documentation is available, indicating potential gaps in security governance and readiness. The use of updated PHP and server software is positive but insufficient to mitigate the major SSL/TLS shortcomings.

Recommendations

  1. Install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  6. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  7. Regularly audit and update all software components and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fluidtime Data Services GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme and WPML for multilingual support. It employs PHP 8.0.30 and Apache server software. Frontend technologies include jQuery and various Enfold theme JavaScript modules. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO plugin, and Matomo Analytics is used for privacy-focused user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and has good content structure and navigation. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. Performance data is unavailable, but the site uses chunked transfer encoding and lazy loading for images, indicating some optimization efforts. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fluidtime.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fluidtime.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.