Skip to main content

Security report for flugeldar.is

Slysavarnafélagið Landsbjörg · Non-profit · Iceland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Slysavarnafélagið Landsbjörg operates the website flugeldar.is as a platform to provide information about fireworks sales, safety guidelines, and rescue services in Iceland. The organization is a well-established non-profit entity focused on public safety and community support. The website serves as an informational and awareness tool, targeting the Icelandic public, especially around the fireworks season. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and uses Prismic CMS for content management, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and published policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern but does not outweigh the legitimacy signals from the content and external references. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flugeldar.is

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
35
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as Iceland's national rescue and safety body, leveraging public trust and donations. Its business model is non-profit, relying on community support and volunteer efforts. The website supports this by providing clear calls to action for donations and volunteer engagement. The partnership with landsbjorg.is, the main domain, reinforces credibility. The site’s content and structure indicate a focus on safety education and regulatory compliance, which aligns with its mission. Growth potential lies in expanding digital outreach and improving transparency around security and privacy practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent, reducing risks related to data interception and privacy violations. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Enhance WHOIS registration information to improve domain trustworthiness and reduce ambiguity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Slysavarnafélagið Landsbjörg
Registration number
560499-2139
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Slysavarnafélagið Landsbjörg
Description
Slysavarnafélagið Landsbjörg is a non-profit organization focused on rescue services and public safety in Iceland. The website provides information about fireworks sales points, safety guidelines, laws and regulations, and ways to support the organization.
Key services
Fireworks sales information, Safety education, Rescue services, Public awareness campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Prismic CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiehub
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiehub
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Icelandic and focused on fireworks sales and safety by a rescue organization.
  3. No forms collecting personal data except a search form with a single query field.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with phone and email.
  5. Social media links to Facebook and Instagram official pages.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and CMS (Next.js, Prismic).
  7. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiehub.
  8. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust but content suggests legitimate non-profit.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) combined with Prismic CMS, enabling efficient content management and server-side rendering for performance. Google Tag Manager and Cookiehub are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management respectively. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, likely due to image sizes and external script loading. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were observed. Hosting provider details are not explicit but HTTPS and CDN usage suggest a professional hosting environment. Opportunities exist to optimize image delivery and implement advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flugeldar.is. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flugeldar.is.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.