Skip to main content

Security report for floez-k.de

kleinkunst und Kulturverein Werne a.d. Lippe e. V. · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a small non-profit cultural association named 'kleinkunst und Kulturverein Werne a.d. Lippe e. V.', focused on promoting local arts and cultural events in Werne, Germany. The site offers information about events, concerts, cinema, and community activities, targeting local culture enthusiasts. The business model is community-oriented, relying on event hosting and cultural promotion without commercial sales. Technically, the website is built using older technology (iWeb 3.0.4) with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, lacking modern responsive design and accessibility features. The site does not demonstrate advanced SEO or performance optimization and appears to have moderate loading performance. Security posture is weak, with no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and no visible incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a basic privacy and terms page but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is functional for its purpose but requires modernization and security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching floez-k.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates in the non-profit cultural sector, serving a local German community. It leverages social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Flickr to engage its audience. The business model is typical for small cultural organizations, focusing on event promotion and community engagement rather than commercial transactions. The lack of detailed WHOIS registrant information slightly reduces transparency but is not uncommon for small non-profits. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed, consistent with a non-profit structure. The website's simplicity and limited technical sophistication reflect a modest operational scale.

Security posture

Security maturity is low, with no HTTPS detected and absence of security headers, exposing the site to potential interception and attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, indicating limited security readiness. The use of legacy meta tags and lack of modern security best practices suggest technical debt and potential risks. No forms or input fields are present that would require enhanced security controls. The site does not appear to collect sensitive user data, reducing immediate risk but also limiting user engagement capabilities. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to minimal privacy policy detail and no cookie consent mechanism.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Modernize the website technology stack to support responsive design and accessibility standards.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  5. Develop and publish a clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security posture and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
kleinkunst und Kulturverein Werne a.d. Lippe e. V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
kleinkunst und Kulturverein Werne a.d. Lippe e. V.
Description
A small non-profit cultural and cabaret association based in Werne a.d. Lippe, Germany, offering cultural events, concerts, cinema, and community activities.
Key services
Event hosting, Concerts, Cinema screenings, Cultural promotion
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local cultural association site with basic content and navigation.
  2. No advanced security or privacy features detected.
  3. No forms found for user data collection except mailto links.
  4. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and Flickr.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No cookie or consent banners present.
  7. Website built with iWeb 3.0.4, indicating older technology.
  8. No HTTPS or security headers information available; likely HTTP only or incomplete SSL setup.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with iWeb 3.0.4, an older web design tool, resulting in static HTML with embedded JavaScript and CSS. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, limiting scalability and maintainability. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization and modern hosting solutions. Mobile optimization is poor, with fixed width layouts and legacy IE compatibility meta tags. SEO is basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection but also limited insight into user behavior. Hosting is via rzone.de, a German hosting provider, consistent with the local focus of the association.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with floez-k.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review floez-k.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.