Skip to main content

Security report for flighthacks.com.au

Flight Hacks · Transportation · Australia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flight Hacks is a specialized Australian website dedicated to helping travelers maximize their frequent flyer points through news, reviews, deals, and guides related to loyalty programs and credit cards. The site leverages affiliate marketing partnerships with major credit card providers and travel-related services to generate revenue. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with content managed likely via Sanity CMS, and uses Cloudflare for DNS services. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, providing a positive user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reputable DNS providers but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, and does not provide visible security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies detected, and no consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flighthacks.com.au

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flight Hacks occupies a niche market segment focused on frequent flyer points and travel rewards in Australia. Its competitive advantage lies in detailed credit card reviews, up-to-date loyalty news, and curated travel deals. The business model centers on content marketing and affiliate partnerships with financial institutions and travel service providers. The target audience includes frequent travelers and credit card users seeking to optimize rewards. Growth potential exists through expanding partnerships and improving privacy compliance. The site maintains consistent branding and a clear content strategy, reinforcing its market position as a trusted resource in the travel rewards domain.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of Cloudflare DNS, which provides some protection against DNS attacks. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not evident, increasing potential risk. Enhancing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and privacy policies would strengthen the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  4. Add visible contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and affiliate links to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flight Hacks
Description
Flight Hacks helps users maximise frequent flyer points by providing the latest points news, deals, reward credit cards, tips, and tricks.
Key services
Frequent flyer points news, Credit card reviews and deals, Travel deals and discounts, Loyalty program guides, Affiliate offers for credit cards and travel-related services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS, Sanity CMS (implied by image URLs), JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
btloader.com
Tracking pixels
btloader.com
Marketing tools
Affiliate links, Tracking scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a content-driven platform focused on frequent flyer points and travel deals.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page HTML.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  5. Affiliate marketing is a key revenue stream.
  6. No visible security or incident response contact information.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, which support server-side rendering and improved SEO. The use of Sanity CMS for content management is inferred from image URLs. Cloudflare DNS is used, enhancing DNS reliability and performance. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes. Performance is moderate, with multiple asynchronously loaded scripts and optimized images. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but requires security hardening and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flighthacks.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flighthacks.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.