Skip to main content

Security report for flexport.com

Flexport · Transportation · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flexport is a leading global supply chain logistics platform founded in 2013, offering comprehensive freight forwarding, fulfillment, customs brokerage, and trade finance services. The company serves a large enterprise customer base, providing end-to-end visibility and control over shipments across ocean, air, and land transportation. Their platform integrates advanced technology to optimize supply chain operations, enabling businesses to reduce costs and improve efficiency. The website reflects a mature, well-established business with strong branding and client trust signals. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Gatsby and React, with integrations for Mapbox and Google Analytics, but currently suffers from an invalid SSL certificate and lack of enabled TLS protocols, which are critical security concerns. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and user-friendly but requires urgent security improvements to ensure safe and trusted user interactions.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of flexport.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flexport.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention flexport.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,338
Employees
14
Customers
1,232
Third parties
92
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-05-30 · 15 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for flexport.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –www.flexport.com2026-05-30
  • –core.flexport.com2026-05-21
  • –flexport.com2026-05-09
  • –www.flexport.com2025-11-13
  • –core.flexport.com2025-11-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flexport positions itself as an essential player in the transportation and logistics sector, leveraging technology to provide scalable and flexible supply chain solutions. Their business model focuses on integrating multiple logistics services into a single platform, targeting businesses that require global shipping and fulfillment capabilities. The company has a broad partnership ecosystem, including fulfillment partners like Deliverr, and serves over 10,000 clients, indicating strong market presence and growth. Their offerings span from ocean and air freight to customs brokerage and trade advisory, highlighting a comprehensive service portfolio. The website content and structure support a high level of professionalism and trust, with clear navigation and detailed service descriptions.

Security posture

The current security posture shows strengths in policy configurations such as SPF and DMARC with strict reject policies and HSTS enabled, which help prevent email spoofing and enforce HTTPS usage. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols significantly undermine the security posture, exposing users to potential risks. The lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption further impacts performance and security. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies were found, indicating areas for improvement in security governance. Overall, while some best practices are in place, critical gaps in SSL/TLS configuration must be addressed promptly.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately resolve SSL certificate issues and enable modern TLS protocols (1.2 and 1.3) to secure data in transit.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  3. Publish explicit security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Enhance monitoring and auditing of third-party scripts and libraries to prevent inclusion of vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Gatsby, hosted on AWS infrastructure as indicated by DNS and registrar data. It integrates Mapbox for mapping features and uses Google Tag Manager and Ketch for analytics and consent management. The site has a large number of resources and images, contributing to a slow load time (~19.6 seconds). Accessibility and SEO optimizations are well implemented with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the invalid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support are critical technical issues that impact user trust and security. Performance improvements could be achieved by optimizing resource loading and reducing page size.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flexport.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flexport.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.