Skip to main content

Security report for fleetpartner.cz

Conti FleetPartner · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FleetPartner is a Czech Republic-based fleet management service provider operating under the Continental AG BestDrive brand umbrella. The website serves primarily as a login portal for users, with basic contact information and corporate branding. The business targets fleet operators and automotive service customers, positioning itself as a regional player in transportation services. The site content is minimal but professional, focusing on user access and contact facilitation. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, FontAwesome, and Chart.js, hosted on CSC DNS infrastructure. While the site is functional and moderately optimized for performance, it lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization features. No CMS or complex frameworks are detected, indicating a custom-built solution. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens, but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS. There is no explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanism, and no public security or incident response policies are found. The login form is basic but uses standard password input types. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. The domain registration is consistent with the business profile, created in 2015 and registered through a reputable registrar. No suspicious patterns or privacy protections are used, supporting legitimacy. Contact details are clearly provided, but the absence of detailed privacy and cookie policies reduces compliance confidence. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and user experience would enhance trust and operational security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fleetpartner.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FleetPartner operates in the transportation sector, focusing on fleet management and automotive services primarily in the Czech Republic. The business model is B2B, serving fleet operators and automotive service customers. The company benefits from association with Continental AG's BestDrive brand, enhancing market credibility. Revenue streams likely include service contracts and fleet management fees. The partnership ecosystem includes BestDrive and Continental AG. Growth indicators are moderate, with a stable domain age and consistent branding. The company maintains a professional but basic online presence, indicating a focus on operational rather than marketing excellence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is implemented, and CSRF tokens are present, indicating awareness of basic web security. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, limiting transparency. The login form is standard but lacks visible advanced protections like multi-factor authentication. Compliance with GDPR is uncertain due to missing explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Enhance SSL/TLS configuration and enforce HTTPS site-wide with strong cipher suites and certificate management.
  4. Develop and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Improve website accessibility and SEO optimization to enhance user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Conti FleetPartner
Description
FleetPartner provides fleet management services, likely targeting automotive fleet customers in the Czech Republic. The site offers login access for users, contact information, and references to BestDrive, indicating a partnership or brand association.
Key services
fleet management, automotive service coordination
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, FontAwesome, Moment.js, Chart.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in page data attributes
  • Password input type used
  • No sensitive data exposed in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a corporate login portal with limited public content.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages are directly linked with URLs.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Site uses modern JavaScript libraries but no CMS detected.
  8. Branding consistent with Continental AG's BestDrive network.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with libraries such as jQuery, FontAwesome, Moment.js, and Chart.js. It does not use a known CMS, indicating a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting is managed via CSC DNS services, suggesting professional infrastructure. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is minimal, with meta tags present but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. The site uses a manifest file indicating some PWA capabilities. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in accessibility, SEO, and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fleetpartner.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fleetpartner.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.