Skip to main content

Security report for fjordnet.com

Fjord · Design · United kingdom

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

92/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

Keep watching fjordnet.com

This scan found 6 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
92

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Accenture holds a dominant position in the global consulting and technology services market, offering a broad range of services that address digital transformation, cloud, AI, cybersecurity, and creative marketing through Accenture Song. The business model is B2B professional services targeting large enterprises across multiple industries including technology, finance, manufacturing, and more. The company leverages a strong partnership ecosystem and invests in emerging technologies such as the metaverse and sustainability solutions. The website content and navigation reflect a mature digital presence aligned with Accenture's brand and market strategy. Growth indicators include extensive service offerings and integration of advanced analytics and marketing tools. The absence of direct contact details on this page suggests a focus on brand and service presentation rather than direct lead capture here.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, robust SSL configuration, and comprehensive security headers. The use of OneTrust for cookie consent indicates compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may impact incident handling readiness. The site uses multiple third-party tracking and analytics scripts, which require ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing formal security and privacy documentation and providing clear channels for security communications.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation or footer.
  2. Add explicit contact information for security incidents, including abuse@ or security@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Review and audit third-party scripts regularly to ensure no vulnerable or deprecated libraries are in use.
  5. Enhance user trust by including visible trust seals, certifications, or testimonials related to security and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Accenture
Description
Accenture is a global professional services company providing consulting, technology, and outsourcing services. This page focuses on Accenture Song, a creative and design collective within Accenture that helps clients serve evolving customer needs.
Key services
Cloud, Cybersecurity, Data and Artificial Intelligence, Digital Engineering and Manufacturing, Emerging Technology, Ecosystem Partners, Finance and Risk Management, Infrastructure and Capital Projects, Learning, Marketing and Experience
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, jQuery, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Adobe Launch (DTM Reactor), AEM (Adobe Experience Manager)
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP and other security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Clicktale
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM, Clicktale, Demdex, Everest Tech, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Vidyard
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive use of modern web technologies and analytics
  3. Strong branding consistency with Accenture corporate identity
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented via OneTrust
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on this page
  6. No direct contact information or forms found on this page
  7. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fjordnet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fjordnet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

fjordnet.com security report: 92/100, low risk | Guard