Skip to main content

Security report for fissman.lv

SIA FISSMAN · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fissman.lv is the official Latvian online store for FISSMAN brand kitchenware and utensils, offering a wide range of original products directly from the manufacturer. The company positions itself as a leading retailer in Latvia with a focus on quality, authenticity, and customer satisfaction, supported by loyalty programs and free delivery. The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform and integrates multiple modern analytics and marketing tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, secure forms, and cookie consent, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the site content and business information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site demonstrates good technical and business maturity with room for enhanced security transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fissman.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector, targeting Latvian consumers interested in quality kitchenware. It leverages direct manufacturer relationships to offer competitive pricing and authentic products. The presence of regional domains suggests a broader international footprint. The company emphasizes customer engagement through reviews, loyalty programs, and multiple contact channels. Partnerships with price comparison sites enhance market visibility. The business model is e-commerce focused, with a medium-sized operation founded in 2009, maintaining consistent branding and trust signals.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses CAPTCHA on forms to prevent abuse. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are present, which increases tracking but also potential attack surface. Security headers are not fully implemented, which is a recommended improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks publicly available security policies or incident response information, which could enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to minimize vulnerability risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to engage security researchers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA FISSMAN
Description
Online store selling original FISSMAN brand kitchenware and utensils directly from manufacturer with guarantees, loyalty programs, and free delivery in Latvia.
Key services
Sale of kitchenware and utensils, Loyalty and bonus programs, Free delivery in Latvia, Customer support and consultation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bitrix CMS, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Heap Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, ClickCease, Sumo, SearchBooster
Frameworks
Bitrix Framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with captcha
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Heap Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
ClickCease
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Heap Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Sumo
Marketing tools
SearchBooster
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official online store for FISSMAN kitchenware in Latvia
  2. Comprehensive product catalog with categories and subcategories
  3. Multiple customer engagement features including reviews and loyalty program
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools
  5. Secure HTTPS with SSL and cookie consent implemented
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit
  7. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges
  8. Good mobile optimization and responsive design
  9. Presence of multiple external trusted domains for social media and analytics
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. It integrates advanced analytics tools including Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Heap, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a strong focus on user behavior analysis and marketing optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses cookie consent mechanisms for privacy compliance. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated but requires ongoing maintenance to ensure security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fissman.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fissman.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.