Skip to main content

Security report for fiskeriet.se

Fiskeriet · Retail · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fiskeriet.se is a Swedish seafood retailer focused on providing fresh, frozen, and ready-to-eat fish and shellfish products. The company emphasizes sustainability and responsible sourcing, supported by certifications such as MSC, ASC, and KRAV. Their website offers recipes, cooking tips, and educational content aimed at inspiring consumers to enjoy seafood more often. The target audience includes environmentally conscious consumers and cooking enthusiasts in Sweden. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and SEO tools like Yoast. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and tracking purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and has good navigation and content quality. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and asynchronous loading of tracking scripts but lacks visible security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fiskeriet.se

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fiskeriet operates in the retail sector with a niche focus on seafood products and culinary inspiration. Their business model combines product sales with content marketing to engage customers. The company positions itself as a sustainable and responsible seafood provider in Sweden, leveraging certifications to build trust. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting their market position. Contact information and physical address are clearly provided, enhancing credibility. The use of popular marketing and analytics tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content or linked domains.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces privacy considerations, but a cookie consent banner is present. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small retail website but could be improved to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fiskeriet
Description
Fiskeriet offers fresh, frozen, and ready seafood products along with knowledge and inspiration to encourage cooking and eating more fish and shellfish. They emphasize sustainability and responsible sourcing with certifications such as MSC, ASC, and KRAV.
Key services
Seafood product sales, Recipe and cooking tips, Sustainability information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.0.3, jQuery, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  4. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly provided in footer.
  5. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools is evident.
  6. Sustainability certifications are prominently mentioned, enhancing trust.
  7. Website built on WordPress with standard plugins and scripts.
  8. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. SEO optimized with Yoast plugin and structured data present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.0.3 with a child theme and uses jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality. SEO is managed via the Yoast SEO plugin, and structured data is implemented using JSON-LD for WebSite and Organization schema. The site loads asynchronously Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel scripts for marketing and tracking. Performance is moderate with responsive images and mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and skip links but could be improved. No advanced hosting or CDN information is visible. The technical stack is standard for a small to medium retail website with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fiskeriet.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fiskeriet.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.