Skip to main content

Security report for fipox.com

FIPOX a.s. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FIPOX a.s. is an established investment group primarily focused on real estate and financial consulting sectors, operating mainly in the Czech Republic with a portfolio of brands such as MyResorts, QPD, Stoix, Domoplan, and THIERRA. The company targets investors and partners interested in sustainable and innovative real estate projects and comprehensive financial services. Their business model combines investment with operational management of their brands, emphasizing long-term value creation. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with clear branding, contact information, and investor-focused content. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, GSAP, ScrollMagic, Owl Carousel, and analytics tools like Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Smartlook. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and some security headers appear missing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which impacts overall trust. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, FIPOX presents a credible and professional business front with room for improvement in security transparency and domain registration clarity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fipox.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FIPOX operates as a medium-sized investment holding company with a focus on real estate and financial consulting in Central Europe, particularly the Czech Republic. Their diversified portfolio includes brands specializing in real estate development, construction efficiency, and financial mediation. The company has been in business for approximately 14 years, indicating market experience and stability. Their business model integrates investment with operational involvement, targeting investors seeking capital appreciation and sustainable projects. The website and social media presence support brand visibility and investor relations. Partnerships with charitable organizations and professional service providers enhance corporate social responsibility and operational support. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that should be addressed to avoid trust issues.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. The use of reputable analytics and tracking tools is balanced with user privacy controls. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder transparency and readiness. The domain's missing WHOIS data is a significant concern, potentially indicating registration or privacy issues. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a corporate site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations fully.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures on the website to improve transparency and stakeholder confidence.
  3. Conduct a thorough audit of third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerable or privacy-invasive components are used.
  4. Verify and update domain registration information to ensure WHOIS data is complete and publicly available, enhancing legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and perform regular security assessments to maintain compliance with GDPR and other relevant regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FIPOX a.s.
Registration number
10958479
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FIPOX a.s.
Description
A group of brands that enrich their industries and create timeless values for generations to come
Key services
Real estate investment and development, Financial consulting and investment mediation, Construction project optimization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, GSAP (TweenMax), ScrollMagic, Owl Carousel, WOW.js, Paroller.js, Smartlook analytics, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Smartlook
Marketing tools
ShareThis, SmartEmailing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Professional corporate website for an investment group focused on real estate
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible domain registration issues
  5. Multiple reputable analytics and marketing tools integrated
  6. Clear contact information and social media presence
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack with jQuery, GSAP for animations, ScrollMagic for scroll-based effects, Owl Carousel for sliders, and WOW.js for animation triggers. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Smartlook, providing comprehensive user behavior insights. The site includes a cookie consent manager (orejime) supporting GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for Google Fonts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags including Open Graph are properly configured. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Security headers are not detected in the provided data, representing a technical risk. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fipox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fipox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.