Skip to main content

Security report for finax.com

FINAX AB · Retail · Sweden

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Finax AB is a Swedish company specializing in gluten-free food products, including flour mixes and müsli, targeting health-conscious consumers and those with gluten intolerance. The company has a strong market presence in Sweden with a well-structured website offering product information, recipes, and sustainability content. The technical infrastructure is based on modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with content managed likely via Storyblok CMS. The website includes cookie consent mechanisms and basic privacy policy compliance, but lacks explicit terms of service and detailed security policies. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and SSL configuration verification. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy, supporting the company's retail business model effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finax.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention finax.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for finax.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Finax operates in the retail sector focusing on gluten-free products, catering to a niche but growing market segment in Sweden. Their competitive advantage lies in product quality and brand trust built since 1973. The business model revolves around product manufacturing and distribution, supported by digital content marketing including recipes and baking tips. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers. No evidence of complex partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The website content and WHOIS data are consistent, reinforcing business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security awareness through cookie consent and privacy policy presence. However, it lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk. The absence of HTTPS confirmation in the HTML content is a concern, though likely HTTPS is used given modern standards. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing SSL configuration. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide with strong SSL/TLS configuration and certificate transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans of website dependencies and infrastructure.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing easy access to cookie and privacy settings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FINAX AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FINAX AB
Description
Producerar och säljer glutenfria livsmedelsprodukter såsom mjölmixar, müsli och andra bakprodukter med fokus på hälsa och glutenfrihet.
Key services
Glutenfria mjölmixar, Glutenfria müsli, Recept och inspiration för glutenfri bakning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Nuxt.js, Vue.js, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is in Swedish language targeting Swedish market.
  2. Strong focus on gluten-free food products and baking.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. No visible forms collecting personal data on main page.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No contact phone numbers explicitly listed on the page.
  9. Email contact info is present in footer (info@finax.se).
  10. No critical security issues detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, improving SEO and performance. The presence of Google Analytics indicates tracking for user behavior analysis. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. However, no explicit hosting provider or CDN information was found. Performance is moderate, with preloading of scripts and optimized images. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML enhancements. SEO is basic with meta tags but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for rich snippets.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finax.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finax.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.