Skip to main content

Security report for finap.fi

Liikenne- ja viestintävirasto Traficom · Transportation · Finland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website finap.fi serves as the National Access Point (NAP) for mobility service data in Finland, operated by Fintraffic Oy under the mandate of the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (Traficom). It provides a centralized platform for mobility service providers to submit essential digital data and for developers to access this data to build integrated mobility solutions. The site is well-positioned as an official government service with a clear focus on transportation data and digital service facilitation. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React, Bootstrap, and Leaflet for mapping, alongside analytics tools like Piwik Pro (Matomo) and a comprehensive cookie consent management system by Cookie Information. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers are not detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in hardening the security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy, registered to a Finnish government agency with consistent information and a long registration period. Overall, finap.fi is a trustworthy, government-backed platform with solid technical implementation and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, improving accessibility features, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts to sustain a strong security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finap.fi

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention finap.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
10
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
10%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for finap.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Finap.fi operates as a government-mandated platform facilitating the digital transformation of mobility services in Finland. Its market position is strong as the official national access point, mandated by regulation to collect and publish essential mobility data. The business model revolves around providing a centralized data catalog and API access for service providers and developers, fostering innovation in transportation services. Revenue streams are likely government-funded, with no direct commercial transactions on the site. The target customers are mobility service providers and application developers. The partnership ecosystem includes Fintraffic Oy and Traficom, with related services like RAE for maritime scheduling. The platform's growth is supported by regulatory requirements and increasing digitalization in transportation. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining data quality, compliance, and expanding developer engagement.

Security posture

The security maturity of finap.fi is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and privacy compliance is strong with a detailed cookie consent mechanism. The site avoids exposing sensitive data and uses reputable analytics services with transparent privacy policies. However, the absence of detected security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for enhancement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to demonstrate security readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident, but ongoing monitoring and security best practices should be prioritized to mitigate risks from third-party scripts and evolving threats. Overall, the site presents a low risk but would benefit from formalized security policies and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance accessibility compliance to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks.
  5. Establish and publicize incident response procedures and contact channels to strengthen security culture and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Liikenne- ja viestintävirasto Traficom
Registration number
2924753-3
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liikenne- ja viestintävirasto Traficom
Description
NAP-liikkumispalvelukatalogi is a national open access point for mobility service providers to submit essential digital data interfaces. It supports development of integrated mobility and information services. The service is operated by Fintraffic Oy on behalf of Traficom.
Key services
Mobility service data catalog, API access for developers, Data validation and publication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Bootstrap, Leaflet, Piwik Pro (Matomo), Cookie Information consent management
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik Pro, Matomo Cloud
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik Pro, Matomo Cloud
Marketing tools
Typeform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-operated national access point for mobility service data in Finland.
  2. Content is in Finnish with some English navigation options.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and descriptions.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Clear contact information and links to official government sites.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern React-based frontend with Bootstrap for responsive design and Leaflet for interactive maps. Analytics are handled via Piwik Pro (Matomo) and Matomo Cloud, with cookie consent managed by Cookie Information. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS, supported by AWS nameservers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site lacks a traditional CMS, indicating a custom or static site architecture. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. Technical debt appears low, though security header implementation is missing. Opportunities exist to improve performance and security hardening. The technical stack supports scalability and integration with other government digital services, aligning with the platform's mission as a national data access point.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finap.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finap.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.