Skip to main content

Security report for fightchatcontrol.eu

Fight Chat Control · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fight Chat Control is a citizen-led advocacy platform focused on opposing the EU's Chat Control proposal, which mandates scanning of all private digital communications including encrypted messages and photos. The website serves as an informational resource and a tool for EU citizens to contact their representatives to protect digital privacy and encryption rights. The platform positions itself as a non-profit entity advocating for fundamental privacy rights within the European Union. Technically, the website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, without reliance on a CMS or complex frameworks. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with a clear navigation structure and multilingual support. However, there is no evidence of advanced analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies, reflecting a privacy-conscious design. From a security perspective, the site lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No cookie consent mechanism is present, which may impact compliance with EU regulations. The absence of contact information and vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency. Nevertheless, the site is served over HTTPS and does not exhibit signs of WAF blocking or malicious content. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with a focus on advocacy and information dissemination. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, publishing security and incident response policies, and providing clear contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fightchatcontrol.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fightchatcontrol.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fightchatcontrol.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the non-profit sector, targeting EU citizens concerned about digital privacy and surveillance. Its business model centers on advocacy and public engagement rather than commercial transactions. The site leverages partnerships with reputable digital rights organizations and maintains a presence on privacy-respecting social media platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky. Growth indicators include active content updates and a contact tool facilitating citizen participation. The lack of commercial elements and focus on transparency position the platform as a credible voice in digital rights advocacy within the EU.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits preparedness for security incidents. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file further reduces transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site does not collect user data through forms beyond the contact tool, which appears to be client-side only. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with EU GDPR and ePrivacy Directive requirements.
  3. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information including email addresses to enhance trust and user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fight Chat Control
Description
Citizen-led information platform advocating against the EU Chat Control proposal which mandates scanning of all private digital communications including encrypted messages and photos.
Key services
Information dissemination, Advocacy, Contact tool for MEPs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a citizen-led advocacy platform focused on opposing the EU Chat Control proposal.
  2. Content is comprehensive regarding the topic of digital privacy and surveillance.
  3. No commercial or business transaction functionality detected.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism or terms of service found.
  6. Social media presence is limited to Mastodon and Bluesky.
  7. No security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files. No CMS or server-side frameworks were detected. The site is multilingual with a language selector supporting over 20 languages, indicating attention to accessibility and inclusivity. Performance appears moderate with no heavy external dependencies or tracking scripts. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced SEO structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph meta tags beyond basic meta description and title. There is an opportunity to improve SEO and technical robustness by adding structured data and optimizing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fightchatcontrol.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fightchatcontrol.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.