Skip to main content

Security report for fiftyfifty.one

50501 Movement · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fiftyfifty.one represents a grassroots political movement named '50501 Movement' focused on organizing protests across 50 states to uphold the Constitution and end executive overreach. The site is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix's Thunderbolt framework and standard web technologies including polyfills and Google Fonts. The content is clear, targeted at a general audience interested in political activism, and the design is consistent and professional for a small-scale movement. Technically, the site uses Wix's hosting and CMS infrastructure, with no detected advanced analytics or tracking beyond Wix's standard scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but SEO and accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is assumed but no explicit security headers or policies are detected. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as lack of contact information, reduces privacy compliance and business credibility scores. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry data unavailability, which is somewhat justified given the political nature of the site but limits trust analysis. No WAF or security challenge is detected, and the site content is fully accessible and safe, with no adult or explicit content. Overall, the site is a legitimate grassroots activism platform with moderate technical maturity and security posture but would benefit from improved privacy compliance, contact transparency, and security best practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fiftyfifty.one

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The 50501 Movement operates as a small grassroots political activism entity focused on organizing synchronized protests nationwide. Its business model is non-commercial, relying on awareness and mobilization rather than revenue generation. The target audience includes politically engaged citizens across the United States. The site positions itself as a unifying platform for protest coordination, leveraging Wix for ease of deployment and maintenance. There is no indication of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The lack of contact details and formal business information suggests an informal organizational structure typical of grassroots movements. The site content quality and branding are consistent, supporting effective communication of its mission.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture typical of Wix-hosted sites. HTTPS is presumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-XSS-Protection are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR and other compliance frameworks. Incident response and security contact information are absent, limiting readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for improvement in headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Verify and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure communications.
  5. Consider publishing an incident response policy and security contact channels to enhance trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
50501 Movement
Description
Join the movement to uphold the Constitution and end executive overreach. 50 protests, 50 states, 1 day: #50501.
Key services
organizing protests, raising awareness
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, core-js, focus-within-polyfill, Wix Thunderbolt, Google Fonts (Montserrat, Helvetica, DIN Next)
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and fonts
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or registry data unavailability
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found
  5. No security headers or advanced security practices detected
  6. Content is focused on a political protest movement with clear messaging
  7. No adult or explicit content detected
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Wix standard scripts
  9. Site is accessible without WAF or security challenge
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on the Wix platform using the Wix Thunderbolt framework, with polyfills for legacy browser support and Google Fonts for typography. The hosting is managed by Wix, providing standard performance and mobile optimization. The site uses modern JavaScript bundles and CSS with responsive design principles. SEO metadata is present but basic, with canonical links and Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No advanced analytics or third-party marketing tools are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical implementation is solid for a small-scale informational site but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fiftyfifty.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fiftyfifty.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.