Förderverein Garchinger Geschichte e.V. · Non-profit · Germany
High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.
Förderverein Garchinger Geschichte e.V. is a small non-profit organization dedicated to researching and preserving the historical development of the city of Garching, Germany. The website serves as an information hub for local history enthusiasts, offering publications, event announcements, and archival resources. The association targets local citizens and guests interested in cultural heritage and historical education. The business model is community-focused, relying on membership and donations to support its activities. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with common plugins such as Slider WD, Contact Form 7, and a cookie notice plugin. It uses Bootstrap 3.3.6 for styling and jQuery 3.7.1 for scripting. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO and accessibility features. Hosting details are limited but name servers indicate a German hosting provider. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no advanced security headers or incident response policies are published. The use of an older Bootstrap version may pose some security risks. No analytics or tracking services are detected, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional for its purpose, with good content quality and clear contact information. The main risks relate to potential outdated components and lack of formal security policies. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and technical updates would enhance the site's security posture and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention fgg-garching.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for fgg-garching.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Domains that imitate fgg-garching.de and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.
Last checked 2026-06-19
See the full lookalike list
A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of fgg-garching.de with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.
Select it in the checkout above.
Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with fgg-garching.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fgg-garching.de.