Skip to main content

Security report for fgbrdkuba.de

Freundschaftsgesellschaft BRD-Kuba e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Freundschaftsgesellschaft BRD-Kuba e.V. is a well-established non-profit solidarity organization founded in 1974, focusing on fostering relations and support for Cuba within Germany. The website serves as an informational platform targeting individuals and groups interested in solidarity activities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and enhanced with the Rank Math SEO plugin, hosted likely by 1&1 IONOS. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration, though it lacks some security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fgbrdkuba.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche market position as the oldest solidarity group with Cuba in Germany, leveraging its long history and focused mission. Its business model is non-profit, relying on community engagement and information dissemination. The website content is relevant and consistent with its mission, targeting a German-speaking audience interested in cultural and political solidarity. The absence of commercial activities or e-commerce indicates a pure informational and advocacy role. The technical infrastructure is modern but could be further improved to enhance security and compliance. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no immediate visible vulnerabilities. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, which could delay handling of security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The site uses standard WordPress plugins and themes, which require regular updates to mitigate risks. Overall, the security culture appears basic and could be enhanced with formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding contact emails and phone numbers explicitly on the website to improve business credibility and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Freundschaftsgesellschaft BRD-Kuba e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Freundschaftsgesellschaft BRD-Kuba e.V.
Description
Die Freundschaftsgesellschaft BRD-Kuba e.V. wurde 1974 gegründet und ist damit die älteste Solidaritätsorganisation mit Kuba in Deutschland.
Key services
Solidarity activities, Information dissemination, Cultural exchange
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Rank Math SEO plugin, Divi Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
wp-stats-manager plugin (likely internal stats)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math PRO SEO plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. Content is in German language targeting German audience interested in Cuba solidarity.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Physical address is clearly stated in structured data.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Rank Math SEO plugin.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with good SSL configuration.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet; no data collection forms visible.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform (WordPress) with a popular theme (Divi) and SEO plugin (Rank Math PRO). The technical stack includes JavaScript and jQuery libraries. Hosting appears to be with a reputable provider (1&1 IONOS). Performance is moderate with caching plugins indicated by minified CSS files. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, there is a lack of advanced security headers and no visible forms or interactive elements in the provided HTML snippet. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and better semantic markup. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fgbrdkuba.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fgbrdkuba.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.