Skip to main content

Security report for ffbatiment.fr

Fédération Française du Bâtiment · Real Estate · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fédération Française du Bâtiment (FFB) is a leading French federation representing artisans and entrepreneurs in the building and construction sector. The organization provides technical knowledge, business management support, regulatory guidance, and environmental performance advice to its members. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, targeting building professionals and stakeholders in France. The content is relevant and tailored to the industry, with clear navigation and comprehensive information about various building techniques and business management topics. Technically, the website is built on the Sitecore CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap 4, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The presence of OneTrust cookie consent demonstrates a mature approach to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but could improve by adding explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data aligns well with the organization's identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong compliance and professional standards. Strategic improvements in security headers and accessibility would further enhance its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ffbatiment.fr

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ffbatiment.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
536
Employees
4
Customers
497
Third parties
35
Weak passwords
22%

Latest record dated 2026-04-25 · 91 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ffbatiment.fr.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –ilp.ffbatiment.fr2026-04-25
  • –www.ilp.ffbatiment.fr2025-11-16
  • –www.btp54.ffbatiment.fr2025-07-14
  • –btp54.ffbatiment.fr2025-06-28

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FFB holds a dominant market position as the primary representative body for the French building sector, focusing on artisans and entrepreneurs. Its business model is non-profit and membership-based, providing services such as technical resources, certifications, and regulatory updates. The federation targets professionals seeking industry knowledge and business support. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on education, compliance, and industry best practices. The use of Sitecore CMS and integration with OneTrust and Google Tag Manager reflects a commitment to digital maturity and regulatory compliance. No direct revenue streams or e-commerce functionalities are evident, consistent with a federation model. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified in the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No signs of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and OneTrust is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is common for such organizations but could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from additional hardening measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish or make accessible a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving regulations and best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fédération Française du Bâtiment
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fédération Française du Bâtiment
Description
Acteur majeur de la filière du BTP, la FFB est la première organisation représentative des artisans et des entrepreneurs du bâtiment. Elle accompagne les professionnels du BTP au quotidien.
Key services
Technical building knowledge dissemination, Business management support, Regulatory guidance, Environmental performance advice, Training and certification information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Bootstrap 4 CSS
Frameworks
Sitecore Experience Forms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR via OneTrust cookie consent
  3. No visible security or privacy policy pages explicitly found but cookie consent and privacy mechanisms present
  4. No exposed emails or phone numbers found in the HTML snippet; contact likely via forms
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  6. Use of Sitecore CMS and modern web technologies
  7. Good SEO and metadata implementation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Sitecore CMS platform, leveraging Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and jQuery 3.4.1 for client-side scripting. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, integrated with OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site uses a large number of CSS component stylesheets indicating modular design. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata present. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a large federation website, though some technical debt may exist in the form of multiple CSS files and reliance on older jQuery versions.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ffbatiment.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ffbatiment.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.