Skip to main content

Security report for feshfesh.group

FESH FESH Group v.o.s. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FESH FESH Group v.o.s. operates a professional racing team based in the Czech Republic, focusing on motorsport events, team activities, and news dissemination. The website serves as a hub for fans and stakeholders to access updates, event information, and team details. The business targets motorsport enthusiasts and operates a niche but professional presence within the transportation sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and JetEngine plugins, hosted likely by Websupport, and incorporates modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie policy and consent mechanism in Czech language, aligning with GDPR requirements. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no terms of service page was found. Overall, the domain registration details are consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feshfesh.group

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
30
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention feshfesh.group, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for feshfesh.group right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a professional racing team with a clear focus on motorsport events and community engagement. Its business model revolves around team sponsorships, event participation, and possibly merchandise sales via a linked e-shop domain. The presence of partner banners indicates active sponsorship relationships. The target market is motorsport fans primarily in the Czech Republic. The company has maintained its domain since 2017, indicating stability. The website content is professionally curated with regular news updates and event coverage, supporting ongoing engagement with its audience. The partnership ecosystem includes at least one known partner (adip.cz) and an e-commerce platform (feshfesh.store).

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and includes common security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy, enhancing protection against common web attacks. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be an area for improvement. No dedicated security or incident response policies are published, which could limit transparency in case of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with explicit policies and DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal terms.
  4. Consider listing a data protection officer or contact for privacy-related inquiries to enhance GDPR compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FESH FESH Group v.o.s.
Description
Professional racing team with activities including events, news, and team information.
Key services
Racing team activities, Event participation, News and updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, JetEngine, Google Fonts, jQuery, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained.
  2. Clear cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are in place.
  3. Active social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram.
  4. No signs of security blocking or WAF interference.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business consistency.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on site.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Content is focused on motorsport and racing team activities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor and JetEngine for page building and dynamic content. It leverages Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is hosted on a provider inferred from nameservers (Websupport). Performance is moderate with some optimization evident such as lazy loading and preloading fonts and images. Accessibility is basic but present, with skip links and semantic HTML elements. SEO is supported by meta tags, canonical links, and structured data. The site uses multiple CSS and JS libraries including jQuery and Swiper for UI components. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for performance and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feshfesh.group. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feshfesh.group.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.