Skip to main content

Security report for ferreropr.com

Ferrero Caribe · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ferrero Caribe operates a consumer-facing website promoting its well-known confectionery brands such as Mon Chéri, Ferrero Rocher, and Raffaello. The site targets general consumers interested in premium chocolate products, primarily in the Caribbean region. The business model focuses on brand promotion and consumer engagement through product information and social media channels. The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS and leverages modern front-end libraries including Bootstrap and jQuery, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Mobile optimization and responsive design are well implemented, providing a good user experience. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement. No forms or direct contact information are provided, limiting direct user interaction and data collection. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could enhance privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ferreropr.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ferrero Caribe maintains a strong market position as a recognized confectionery brand with a medium-sized digital presence. The website serves as a marketing and informational platform rather than an e-commerce portal. The company leverages social media effectively to engage its audience. The domain age and registration details support legitimacy and stability. However, the lack of detailed contact information and security policies may limit trust for more security-conscious users. There is no evidence of direct sales or transactional services on the site. The business ecosystem appears focused on brand awareness and regional market penetration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with clientTransferProhibited domain status and presumed HTTPS usage. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure policies indicates gaps in security best practices. No incident response or security policy information is published, which may impact compliance with regulations such as GDPR or NIS2. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, potentially exposing it to privacy compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ferrero Caribe
Description
Website promoting Ferrero chocolate brands including Mon Chéri, Ferrero Rocher, Raffaello, Rondnoir, Barras, and Ferrero Collection targeted at consumers interested in these products.
Key services
brand promotion, product information, consumer engagement via social media
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.4.1, Drupal 10, Slick Carousel, Anime.js, Fancybox
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Spanish with some English metadata.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or footer.
  4. Social media links to official Ferrero PR Facebook, Instagram, and Pinterest pages are present.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection forms visible.
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Website uses Drupal 10 CMS with multiple external CSS and JS libraries loaded via CDN.
  9. No visible security headers in HTML content; SSL status unknown from provided data.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond social media links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Drupal 10 CMS with a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap 3.4.1, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Anime.js, and Fancybox. Stylesheets and scripts are loaded both locally and via CDN, which can improve performance but requires monitoring for third-party risks. The site is mobile responsive and uses semantic HTML with accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and charset tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting appears stable with Barbero & Associates Limited as registrar and nameservers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ferreropr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ferreropr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.