Skip to main content

Security report for fenopix.com

fenopix · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fenopix is a small technology company specializing in providing an HTML5 and JavaScript charting library called CanvasJS. The website positions itself as a niche provider of responsive, high-performance charting solutions suitable for developers and businesses requiring interactive data visualization. The business model revolves around software product offerings, with additional promotion of a Twitter extension called HashPlug. The site demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity, utilizing WordPress CMS, Bootstrap framework, and integrating Google Analytics and social media for marketing. The technical infrastructure is stable with Cloudflare DNS and GoDaddy domain registration, but lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing explicit security policies or incident response information. Overall, the website is professional and safe, but lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Strategic improvements in security and privacy transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fenopix.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fenopix holds a stable market position as a specialized provider of JavaScript charting tools, targeting developers and businesses needing customizable and performant charting solutions. The company leverages partnerships with CanvasJS and promotes additional products like HashPlug, indicating a diversified product ecosystem. The website content and domain age suggest an established presence since 2010. The business model is product-focused with revenue likely generated through software licensing or subscriptions. The target audience includes software developers and enterprises requiring data visualization tools. The company maintains a modest digital footprint with social media engagement and Google Analytics tracking. No evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries was found, indicating a small-sized operation focused on core product offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No privacy or security policies are published, and there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which are gaps in compliance and security readiness. Google Analytics is used for tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators are present. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. Overall, the security maturity is basic, with room for significant improvements in policy transparency and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) to improve security communication and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
fenopix
Description
Beautiful & Responsive JS Charts Library based on HTML5 Canvas Element. Supports touch based devices too!
Key services
CanvasJS HTML5 & JavaScript Charts, Twitter Extension for Chrome (HashPlug)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, CanvasJS
Frameworks
Bootstrap, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site focused on promoting CanvasJS charting library.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact info limited to an email address and Twitter link in footer.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage for data collection.
  5. Site uses Google Analytics and social media integration for marketing.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response info provided.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled on domain.
  8. Site content is professional and safe for general audiences.
  9. No suspicious or malicious indicators found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and uses jQuery and CanvasJS libraries for interactive charting features. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains including CDN for CanvasJS and social media SDKs. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Cloudflare DNS servers but lacks DNSSEC. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking. The site does not contain forms for data collection on the homepage, reducing attack surface. Overall, the technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fenopix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fenopix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.