Skip to main content

Security report for fenixoutdoor.se

Fenix Outdoor · Retail · Sweden

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fenix Outdoor is a large international group specializing in premium outdoor brands and retail, including well-known subsidiaries such as Fjällräven, Hanwag, and Royal Robbins. The company focuses on enabling outdoor experiences with a strong emphasis on sustainability and quality. The website is professionally designed using WordPress, with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. It integrates modern technologies such as Google Analytics and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit security policies are absent. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts domain trust analysis but the overall business credibility remains high due to consistent branding and professional content. The site is free from adult or questionable content and is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fenixoutdoor.se

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fenixoutdoor.se, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
19
Employees
1
Customers
14
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2026-06-10 · 4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fenixoutdoor.se.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.fenixoutdoor.se2026-06-10

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fenix Outdoor operates as a brand group and retail operator in the outdoor sector, targeting outdoor enthusiasts and consumers seeking premium products. Their business model revolves around managing multiple outdoor brands and retail chains across several countries, primarily Sweden and Europe. The company maintains partnerships with various retail sites and emphasizes sustainability in its operations. The website content and structure reflect a mature digital presence with clear market positioning. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact forms and controlled communication channels. The company appears to have a stable ecosystem of subsidiaries and partners, supporting its international footprint.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Cookiebot is managed with privacy considerations. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could benefit from enhanced header policies and transparency around security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding direct verified contact emails and phone numbers for improved business credibility and user trust.
  5. Maintain and update WHOIS information to ensure domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fenix Outdoor
Description
Fenix Outdoor is an international group of premium outdoor brands focused on products for nature and outdoor life. It includes brands such as Fjällräven, Tierra, Hanwag, Royal Robbins, Devold, and Frilufts Retail. Their mission is to enable all people to spend unforgettable and inspiring moments in nature.
Key services
Outdoor product brands, Retail operations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Montseratt font, VAGRounded font
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact form present.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  6. Website built on WordPress with modern fonts and Google Analytics integration.
  7. Clear business focus on premium outdoor brands and retail.
  8. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing modern web fonts and integrating Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business scale, though opportunities exist to enhance security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fenixoutdoor.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fenixoutdoor.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.