Skip to main content

Security report for fendi.com

FENDI · Retail · Italy

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FENDI is a renowned luxury fashion brand established in 1925, operating under the LVMH group. The website serves as the official online boutique offering a wide range of products including fashion collections for women, men, kids, and home. It targets a global audience with a focus on high-end luxury consumers. The business model centers on e-commerce retail complemented by personalized shopping services and boutique appointments. The site demonstrates strong branding consistency and high-quality content aligned with its market position. Technically, the website leverages a modern e-commerce platform (Demandware/Salesforce Commerce Cloud) with integrations for advanced search (Algolia), personalization (Dynamic Yield), and analytics (Google Tag Manager, Matomo, AWS RUM). The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and encrypted payment processing. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed, representing an area for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally managed, though WHOIS data is unavailable likely due to privacy protections. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing transparency on data retention to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fendi.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fendi.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,135
Employees
32
Customers
2,023
Third parties
80
Weak passwords
12%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 26 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fendi.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.fendi.com2026-05-28
  • –sts.fendi.com2026-05-27
  • –sts.fendi.com2026-05-17
  • –sts.fendi.com2026-05-15
  • –sts.fendi.com2026-04-25

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FENDI holds a strong market position as a luxury fashion retailer under LVMH, targeting affluent consumers worldwide. The company benefits from a well-established brand heritage dating back to 1925. Revenue streams primarily come from direct online sales and boutique services. The website supports customer engagement through personalized shopping assistance and appointment bookings, enhancing customer experience. Partnerships with Salesforce and advanced marketing tools indicate a sophisticated ecosystem supporting sales and customer data management. Growth indicators include active use of personalization and analytics technologies. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages social media channels effectively for marketing and customer outreach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong security headers, and encrypted payment data handling. Use of CSRF tokens and consent management aligns with best practices. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy and cookie policies. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and demonstrate security commitment. Overall, the security measures are adequate for an e-commerce luxury brand but could be enhanced with improved transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency on data retention and processing practices in privacy documentation.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FENDI
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FENDI
Description
The Official Fendi Online Boutique. Daring creativity and craftsmanship from Rome to the world since 1925. Discover the latest collections for women, men, kids, and home.
Key services
Online retail of fashion collections for women, men, kids, and home, Personalized shopping assistance, Appointment booking in boutiques, Product care and returns services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, VideoJS, Algolia Search, Dynamic Yield, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, AWS RUM, Salesforce integration
Frameworks
Demandware (Salesforce Commerce Cloud)
Platforms
E-commerce platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Encrypted payment data
  • Use of security tokens (CSRF)
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Matomo, AWS RUM, CQuotient
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Dynamic Yield, AWS RUM, Riskified, Marketing Cloud Analytics
Marketing tools
Algolia Search Insights, Dynamic Yield Personalization, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong branding and consistent luxury fashion retail presentation
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Use of multiple modern analytics and marketing technologies
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable or protected, but website legitimacy is high
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Salesforce Commerce Cloud (Demandware), a robust e-commerce platform supporting scalability and security. It integrates advanced search (Algolia), personalization (Dynamic Yield), and analytics (Google Tag Manager, Matomo, AWS RUM) technologies, indicating a modern and data-driven infrastructure. The site uses VideoJS for media playback and employs consent management tools for privacy compliance. Performance is optimized with preloading and asynchronous script loading. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well implemented. Technical risks are minimal, though reliance on multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security monitoring. The infrastructure supports a high-quality user experience aligned with luxury retail standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fendi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fendi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.