Skip to main content

Security report for fendercare.com

James Fisher and Sons · Transportation · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

James Fisher and Sons operates as a specialist provider in the maritime transport industry, serving sectors such as defence, oil and gas, ports, construction, and renewables. The company offers a range of marine market products and bespoke solutions tailored to the global marine industry. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting specialized maritime customers. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as lack of contact information, suggests gaps in compliance and user engagement. Security posture is moderate with no explicit security headers or policies detected, and WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration transparency. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and contact disclosures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fendercare.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an important player in the maritime transport and energy sectors, focusing on specialized marine services and sustainable solutions. Its business model is B2B, targeting niche maritime industry segments including defence and renewables. The website content emphasizes bespoke marine solutions and tanker chartering, indicating diversified service offerings. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information on the site limits deeper business intelligence insights. The presence of multiple analytics and tracking tools suggests an interest in marketing and user behavior analysis. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the content provided.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes several third-party analytics and tracking scripts, which introduces a moderate level of user tracking. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and no visible security or incident response policies are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. WHOIS data is missing, which may indicate domain registration issues or privacy protection, but no direct evidence of malicious activity was found. The site would benefit from implementing security best practices such as security headers, clear privacy disclosures, and incident response contacts to enhance its security posture and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  3. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Ensure domain registration information is accurate and publicly available to improve legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and improve privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
James Fisher and Sons
Description
We serve customers in specialised segments of the Maritime transport Industry, including defence, oil and gas, ports, construction and renewables.
Key services
specialised marine market products, services for global marine industry, solutions for global marine industry, sustainable solutions for global marine market, ship-to-ship transfers, tanker chartering, bespoke marine solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Tag Manager, CookieLaw.org Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
CookieLaw.org Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and professional
  2. No WHOIS data available indicating possible unregistered domain or WHOIS privacy
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the analyzed page
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts present
  5. No contact information explicitly found on the page analyzed
  6. No security or incident response policies visible
  7. Website focuses on maritime transport industry services
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern JavaScript-based front-end with multiple analytics and tracking services including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Ahrefs Analytics. It uses cookie consent management scripts from CookieLaw.org. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts. The site appears to be well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good based on viewport meta tags and responsive font loading. Accessibility features are basic with standard HTML5 semantic elements. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fendercare.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fendercare.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.