Skip to main content

Security report for feetransport.cz

FEE Transport s.r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FEE Transport s.r.o. is a Czech-based logistics and transportation company offering a wide range of services including road, express, air, sea, oversized transport, warehousing, and auditing of transport services. The company operates multiple branches across the Czech Republic and emphasizes professionalism, reliability, and financial stability. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies and comprehensive service information. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. Security-wise, the site implements cookie consent and GDPR-compliant privacy policies but lacks visible advanced security headers and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection slightly reduces transparency but does not significantly impact trust given the detailed contact information and certifications displayed. Overall, the company presents a credible and professional image with room for security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feetransport.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses requiring logistics and transport solutions, positioning itself as a reliable regional player with ISO certifications and a broad service portfolio. Their business model focuses on service provision with multiple physical locations and digital channels including a career portal and mobile app. The presence of partner portals and social media engagement indicates a well-rounded ecosystem. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on quality and compliance, leveraging certifications as trust signals. Growth potential is supported by active recruitment and participation in industry events.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. Cookie consent and privacy policies align with GDPR requirements, but no dedicated security policy or incident response contacts are found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK introduces typical tracking risks but no vulnerabilities are evident in the HTML content. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing incident response information, and conducting regular security audits to enhance resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FEE Transport s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FEE Transport s.r.o.
Description
Dodavatel dopravních a spedičních služeb na vnitrostátní i mezinárodní úrovni s důrazem na zkušenost, profesionální přístup, úsporu, spolehlivost a silné cashflow.
Key services
Silniční doprava, Expresní doprava, Letecká a námořní doprava, Nadrozměrná doprava, Skladová logistika, Sběrná služba, Audit dopravních služeb, Intralogistika
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy in place, indicating GDPR compliance.
  4. Multiple physical branch locations with detailed contact info enhance trust.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and social media presence supports digital maturity.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  7. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts found.
  8. Certifications and awards prominently displayed, supporting business credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The CMS appears to be EasyWeb, as indicated by footer credits and script paths. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses multiple external resources hosted on reputable CDNs. No hosting provider information is directly available. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feetransport.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feetransport.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.