Skip to main content

Security report for fdih.dk

Fdih · Internet · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and DNS health.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fdih.dk

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dansk Erhverv operates as a large, established business advocacy organization in Denmark, targeting Danish businesses and stakeholders interested in commerce and policy. Their business model revolves around membership and policy influence, providing key services such as policy analysis and e-commerce insights. The organization leverages partnerships with major technology providers like Microsoft and uses multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and advertising. The lack of visible contact details and WHOIS data suggests potential areas for improving transparency and trustworthiness. The website's content quality is basic, with room for enhancement in navigation and content relevance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and a detailed cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. The use of Microsoft Azure and Cloudflare services indicates reliance on reputable cloud and CDN providers. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are publicly available. The absence of contact information for security incidents and lack of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are gaps in the security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. Overall, the security practices are adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish clear terms of service, security policy, and incident response information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  4. Enhance website content quality and navigation to reduce 404 errors and improve user experience.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible security reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dansk Erhverv
Description
Dansk Erhverv is a Danish business organization providing policy analysis and support for businesses, including e-commerce topics.
Key services
Policy analysis, Business advocacy, E-commerce insights
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Webpack, Microsoft Azure, Cloudflare, CookieInformation Consent Management, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Privacy policy with GDPR compliance
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Azure AI session tracking, Episerver
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Bing, LinkedIn
Tracking pixels
Optimizely, ClickDimensions
Marketing tools
ClickDimensions, Scratcher
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website currently returns a 404 error page for the requested URL.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories and processors.
  3. No WHOIS data available from DK Whois server for domain.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the analyzed page.
  5. Use of multiple Microsoft Azure services and cookies.
  6. Privacy policy is linked and appears GDPR compliant.
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No forms detected on the analyzed page.
  10. Site uses Google Tag Manager and multiple external scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fdih.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fdih.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

fdih.dk security report: 80/100, low risk | Guard