Skip to main content

Security report for fdf.dk

FDF · Non-profit · Denmark

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FDF.dk is the official website of FDF, a Danish voluntary youth organization focused on outdoor activities and community engagement for children and young people. The organization has an established presence since 1996, reflected in the domain age and consistent WHOIS data. The website is built on WordPress and uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and Google Fonts, providing a good user experience with mobile responsiveness and clear navigation. The site employs a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, detailing cookie categories and third-party data processors. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly detected, representing areas for improvement. No direct contact information or security policies are found, which could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving its audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fdf.dk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
87
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FDF operates as a non-profit youth organization in Denmark, targeting children, youth, families, and volunteers. Its business model centers on community engagement and educational outdoor activities. The website supports this mission with relevant content and services, including event information and educational resources. The organization leverages partnerships with cookie consent providers and analytics platforms to maintain compliance and optimize user experience. The absence of direct contact details and terms of service suggests a focus on community rather than commercial transactions. The website's market position is that of a well-established national youth organization with a medium-sized operational scale.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR requirements. The use of reputable third-party analytics and consent management services further strengthens compliance. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS indicate potential areas for enhancement. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which could limit transparency and readiness in case of security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a terms of service page to cover legal aspects and user agreements.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FDF
Description
FDF is a Danish voluntary youth organization focused on outdoor activities, community, and personal development for children and young people.
Key services
Youth group activities, Outdoor camps and events, Educational programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.3, Google Fonts (Work Sans, Oswald, Rubik), WordPress, PHP, Piwik Pro Analytics, Cookie Information Consent Management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik Pro, Quantcast
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google, Youtube
Tracking pixels
Piwik Pro, Quantcast
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (via Piwik Pro), Youtube embedded videos
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and third-party data processor disclosures.
  2. No explicit privacy policy page URL found but cookie declaration is detailed and GDPR compliant.
  3. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Website is built on WordPress with modern frontend technologies and good mobile responsiveness.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
  7. External links mostly to trusted domains related to cookie management, analytics, and embedded content.
  8. Security headers not explicitly visible in provided data; recommend verification and enhancement.
  9. No visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  10. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 5.3.3 for responsive design and Google Fonts for typography. It integrates third-party services such as Piwik Pro and Quantcast for analytics, and Cookie Information for consent management. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with focus management in modals and ARIA attributes. Performance is moderate with CDN usage for fonts and scripts. No broken elements or errors were detected in the provided content. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, though hosting provider details are not explicit. The site could improve by adding security headers and enabling DNSSEC for enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fdf.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fdf.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.