Skip to main content

Security report for fcg.aero

Flight Consulting Group · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flight Consulting Group is a well-established business aviation holding company based in Latvia, founded in 2000. It offers a broad range of aviation services including flight support, ground handling, VIP charter flights, trip support, and aviation consulting. The company operates a major business aviation center, FBO RIGA, and has several subsidiaries specializing in dispatch, travel agency services, and aviation infrastructure development. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, supporting its market position as a leading aviation service provider in Europe and the Baltics. Technically, the site uses modern analytics and tracking tools, is mobile optimized, and employs HTTPS with some security best practices, though it lacks some security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The WHOIS data is incomplete and lacks transparency, which slightly reduces trust but does not negate the legitimacy supported by the detailed business information and certifications. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional business presence with room for improvement in privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fcg.aero

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fcg.aero, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
7
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fcg.aero.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –exch-ha.fcg.aero2026-05-25
  • –exch-ha.fcg.aero2025-11-14
  • –exch-ha.fcg.aero2025-11-13
  • –fcg.aero2025-08-27
  • –fcg.aero2025-08-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets business aviation operators, private and corporate aircraft owners, and governmental organizations, providing integrated aviation services through its subsidiaries. It holds memberships in key industry associations and has received multiple awards, reinforcing its competitive advantage. The business model is a holding structure with diversified aviation services, enabling comprehensive solutions for clients. Growth indicators include recent acquisitions and expansion of service networks across Europe, the Baltics, and Africa. The company emphasizes quality, reliability, and customer-centric services, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the business aviation sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of CSRF tokens. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, and does not publish incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. The overall security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security policies and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve trust.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet international standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Flight Consulting Group Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flight Consulting Group
Description
Flight Consulting Group is a business aviation holding company established in 2000, providing comprehensive solutions in flight support, business jet ground handling, private charters, aircraft sales, and aviation consulting. It operates a large business aviation center (FBO RIGA) at Riga International Airport and offers services including dispatch, trip support, ground handling, VIP charter flights, crew travel agency, and aviation infrastructure development.
Key services
Flight planning, Ground handling, VIP charter flights, International trip support, Aviation consulting, Business aviation infrastructure development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Yandex Metrika, Google Custom Search Engine, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain registration transparency.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple emails and phone numbers.
  6. Multiple industry certifications and awards are prominently displayed.
  7. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools is evident.
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Yandex Metrika, and Swiper.js for UI components. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from additional technical SEO and accessibility improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fcg.aero. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fcg.aero.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.