Skip to main content

Security report for fccwl.com

广州陆连物流有限公司 · Transportation · China

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

广州陆连物流有限公司 operates a Chinese-language logistics platform specializing in return trucks, freight transport, and related services across China. The website offers a comprehensive range of logistics services including equipment transport, long-distance moving, cold chain distribution, and large item shipping. The company positions itself as a professional and registered logistics provider with a focus on cost-effective and timely service. Technically, the website uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper for UI elements and is moderately optimized for mobile devices. However, there is no evidence of advanced CMS or hosting provider details. Security posture is moderate with no visible HTTPS or security headers in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the active website presence. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fccwl.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets logistics customers in China needing freight, return truck, and moving services. It leverages a network of vehicles and offers a variety of transport options including cold chain and large equipment logistics. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on connecting customers with transport solutions. The website content and external links suggest a broad partnership ecosystem within the logistics sector. The company appears small-sized but with a nationwide service footprint. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies are weaknesses that could impact trust and regulatory compliance. The company’s competitive advantage lies in pricing and service responsiveness. Growth indicators are not explicit but the extensive content and service coverage imply an established market presence.

Security posture

The website shows a basic security posture with no HTTPS status visible in the data, no security headers, and no published security or incident response policies. No forms collect sensitive data, reducing immediate risk, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate but could be improved by implementing HTTPS, security headers, and formal privacy and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure all pages load securely.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to enhance security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
广州陆连物流有限公司
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
广州陆连物流有限公司
Description
陆连物流公司承接全国各地回程车、回头车、空车配货、返程车等多种车型运输，专业承接设备运输、工地搬家、大型机械设备运输及长途搬家业务。公司为正式注册企业，提供物流运输、仓储、配送、货代及信息管理等服务，覆盖全国多个省市。
Key services
回程车货运, 回头车货运, 返程车物流, 顺风车物流, 长途搬家, 大件运输, 冷链冷藏配送, 整车零担配货
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Clipboard.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language focused on logistics services.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information including phone, email, and physical address is clearly presented.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS status visible from provided data; security posture is moderate.
  5. No forms detected that collect personal data, reducing immediate data exposure risk.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a significant concern for domain legitimacy.
  7. Website uses common JS libraries like jQuery and Swiper for UI.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  9. Content is safe with no adult or questionable material.
  10. Multiple external links to logistics and related service providers present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML structure with common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and Clipboard.js for UI interactions. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization detected. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks identified. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fccwl.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fccwl.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.