Skip to main content

Security report for faunsav.fr

Faun Environnement · Transportation · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

59/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Faun Environnement operates a professional after-sales service website focused on spare parts cataloging and ordering for environmental and waste management vehicles. The website targets business customers and service technicians, providing tools for incident declaration, order management, and returns. The company is established since 2011 and operates primarily in France. The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with a mix of modern JavaScript libraries and Bootstrap for styling, indicating a moderately mature technical infrastructure. While the site is functional and professionally presented, it uses some outdated libraries and lacks explicit security policies. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent but could be improved with modern security headers and updated libraries. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its niche well but would benefit from technical and security modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching faunsav.fr

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Faun Environnement holds a specialized position in the transportation sector, focusing on after-sales services for waste management vehicles. Their business model revolves around providing an online catalog and ordering system for spare parts, targeting municipal and industrial clients. The presence of multi-language options suggests an international or European customer base. The company leverages partnerships with technology providers like Spelog for their platform. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website and integration of incident and return management. However, no explicit certifications or advanced security disclosures are present, indicating room for maturity in compliance and trust-building.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.3) introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The large number of hidden __VIEWSTATE fields typical of ASP.NET WebForms may increase attack surface if not properly protected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires updates and policy enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  3. Develop and publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Optimize __VIEWSTATE usage to reduce payload size and potential attack surface.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing clear terms of service and vulnerability disclosure information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Faun Environnement
Description
Site SAV de Faun Environnement : Vues éclatées et commande de pièces de rechange. Simplifies maintenance of garbage trucks and sweepers.
Key services
Spare parts catalog, Order management, Incident declaration, Return of new parts (out of warranty)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery 1.11.3, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Select2, Toastr, SignalR, Chart.js, Gauge.js, iframeResizer
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms, Bootstrap
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET WebForms)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Xiti (AT Internet)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Xiti (AT Internet)
Marketing tools
Toastr, CookieConsent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional after-sales service portal for Faun Environnement.
  2. Content is in French with multi-language support links.
  3. No signs of phishing or malware.
  4. Uses legacy ASP.NET WebForms technology with modern JS libraries.
  5. Cookie consent is implemented properly.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented.
  7. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond cookie consent and legal mentions.
  8. No visible social media links for the company.
  9. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a legacy ASP.NET WebForms framework supplemented with modern JavaScript libraries such as Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Select2, and Chart.js. The presence of SignalR indicates some real-time capabilities. The site uses a custom CMS or proprietary platform without popular CMS signatures. Performance is moderate with asynchronous AJAX calls for dynamic content loading. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta tags but no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely a dedicated or managed Windows server environment. Technical debt is evident in legacy framework usage and outdated libraries, suggesting modernization opportunities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with faunsav.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review faunsav.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.