Skip to main content

Security report for fashiongo.net

Fashiongo · Retail · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fashiongo.net operates as a leading online B2B wholesale marketplace specializing in fashion apparel, shoes, accessories, and home decor. The platform connects wholesale vendors with retail buyers globally, offering services including dropshipping to facilitate business growth. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, indicating a mature approach to user data protection and compliance. Technically, the site employs a modern JavaScript stack including Vue.js, jQuery, and various analytics and marketing tools, supporting a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and encryption libraries in use, though some security headers and explicit policies are absent. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues, which slightly impacts business credibility. Overall, the site is well-structured, secure, and compliant, serving a large wholesale retail audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fashiongo.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fashiongo holds a strong market position as a top B2B wholesale fashion marketplace, targeting wholesale vendors and retail buyers. Its business model focuses on facilitating bulk trade and dropshipping services, which diversifies revenue streams and appeals to a broad customer base. The platform's extensive category offerings and affiliate programs suggest a well-developed partnership ecosystem. The use of multiple advertising and tracking networks indicates active marketing efforts to drive growth. However, the lack of visible registrant information in WHOIS data warrants further due diligence. The company appears to operate at a large scale with a focus on retail and e-commerce sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, use of encryption libraries, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, as well as no published security policy or incident response contacts, indicates room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is suggested by the privacy and cookie policies. The extensive use of third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fashiongo
Description
FASHIONGO is the No.1 Online business-to-business (B2B) fashion marketplace, efficiently connecting wholesale vendors and retail buyers from around the world. With Fashiongo, buyers can discover new ways to grow their businesses, including dropshipping!
Key services
wholesale clothing, shoes, accessories, home decor, dropshipping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Vue.js, Axios, Moment.js, Cropper.js, GSAP, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Impact Universal Tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of encryption libraries (AES, RSA)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, TikTok Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, TikTok Ads, Facebook Ads, Pinterest Ads, Impact
Tracking pixels
Heap Analytics, TikTok Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Pinterest Tag
Marketing tools
Heap Analytics, Impact Universal Tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B wholesale fashion marketplace
  2. No WHOIS data available, raising some legitimacy concerns
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  5. No security policy or incident response contact found
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected
  7. Good SEO and mobile optimization
  8. No adult or explicit content detected
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including Vue.js for reactive UI components, jQuery for legacy support, Axios for HTTP requests, and Moment.js for date/time handling. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Heap Analytics, TikTok Pixel, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a data-driven approach to user engagement. The site is mobile optimized and uses CSS frameworks and libraries like Slick Carousel and GSAP for animations. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust e-commerce experience but should focus on performance tuning and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fashiongo.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fashiongo.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.