Skip to main content

Security report for fashionforhelp.cz

Fashion for help · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fashion for help is a Czech Republic based charity second-hand retail network specializing in branded clothing sourced from the USA, Switzerland, and the EU. The organization operates a network of stores offering high-quality second-hand fashion items, targeting consumers interested in sustainable and charitable shopping. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear business focus. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with modern web technologies and Google Fonts integration. It employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned within its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fashionforhelp.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fashionforhelp.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fashionforhelp.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail and non-profit sectors, focusing on second-hand branded clothing. Its market position is niche, leveraging international sourcing to provide premium second-hand apparel. The business model combines charity with retail, appealing to socially conscious consumers. The website's structured data and social media presence on Facebook support its credibility. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company was founded in 2016, consistent with domain registration data. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the main page suggests contact is likely managed via forms or dedicated contact pages. The business shows moderate digital maturity with room for enhanced security and transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security baseline. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. The cookie consent banner indicates GDPR compliance efforts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security posture is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header policies and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding explicit business contact details such as verified emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fashion for help
Description
Jsme síť dobročinných second handů s nabídkou oblečení světových značek. Dovážíme prvotřídní značkové oblečení z USA, Švýcarska a EU.
Key services
Second-hand clothing sales, Import of branded clothing from USA, Switzerland, and EU
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Divi Theme, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in provided HTML
  4. Social media presence on Facebook confirmed
  5. Uses WordPress with Divi theme and several plugins
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contacts
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. Good SEO metadata and structured data implemented
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The hosting is managed via REG-INTERNET-CZ with name servers ns.vas-hosting.com and ns.vas-hosting.eu. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were identified, but security header implementation is lacking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fashionforhelp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fashionforhelp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.